Comments on: An Expedition for Information https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:54:48 +0000 hourly 1 By: Ardis https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-1320686 Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:54:48 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-1320686 you are really a good webmaster. The web site loading
pace is amazing. It sort of feels that you’re doing any unique trick.
Also, The contents are masterwork. you have done a magnificent
process on this subject!

]]>
By: Russ https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3648 Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:42:13 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3648 No freakin' way. In a million years, I never expected that. Tell him Russ Henderson said hi!

]]>
By: Noah Whinston https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3647 Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:33:22 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3647 In reply to Russ.

that is in fact the same Greg Ivey 😀

]]>
By: Russ https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3646 Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:43:31 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3646 Interesting read. I've actually been trying to 'trade-down' with most of my trades up to this point, though I don't think I was doing it as intentionally as I probably will be from this point, as up till now it's been an almost unconscious thing as I ry to build a trade binder.

One thing I'm extremely interested in hearing more about is your journey into becoming a dealer. My wife and I plan on opening our own game shop sometime next year (in fact, this is the whole reason I've started playing Magic again, just so I can learn the lay of the land for what essentially will be our primary product) While it sounds like you're planning on being a dealer at events, while I intend to open up a local shop, I'm sure a lot of it is a similar process. Definitely looking forward to hearing more.

Lastly, I know Corbin is from Oklahoma, as meeting him at FNM was how I first really heard about the site, but are you perhaps from Oklahoma? I just knew a guy named Greg Ivey back in High School (in Wilburton, Oklahoma), who used to play MTG. Would be a small world if it was the same guy.

Anyway, looking forward to reading more.

]]>
By: Michael https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3645 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:31:25 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3645 So are you saying pickup Bloodghasts? I don't think their value will increase much. I'm not a professional at this but I can do the math of my own experience with the card. Every draft of Zendikar I did when it was 3x Zen, I would open a Bloodghast. There would also usually be one more at the table *seating eight people at a table* The card was so high in supply stores couldn't give them away. So maybe there is something to this card. I think it's just be better to grab vengvines since they are the actual key to the deck. unless you want to be the guy controlling every bloodghast so you can monopolize the price.

Good article though, was a good read.

]]>
By: John Jenkins https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3644 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:47:05 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3644 A Limited Liability Company ("LLC") is a non-corporate limited liability entity organized and existing as a separate "person" under state law (this is a general discussion but it is largely based on Delaware law. It's not legal advice. I am probably not licensed in your state, in any event).

So, what does that mean? First, it's non-corporate. Unless you elect otherwise (and unless you consult an accountant or lawyer, you should not elect otherwise), an LLC in which there are multiple members will be taxed under Subchapter K of the Internal Revenue Code, which means all tax items are passed through the LLC to the members of the LLC. As a consequence, the gain, loss, deductions and credits are allocated to those members and nothing (or almost nothing) is taxed at the entity level (contrast this to corporations where there is a tax at the corporate level before the stockholders can draw any money out of the corporation).

Second, it's limited liability. That means that if someone does business with the LLC, the members of the LLC are not responsible for the LLC's debts and obligations (unless there is a personal guarantee involved). This doesn't protect you from your OWN liability (if you sign something in a personal capacity, you are liable, not the LLC. If you injure someone, it's your responsibility, but it might ALSO be the LLC's responsibility if the injury is in the course of your work.

One interesting attribute of the LLC is that the limited liability works in BOTH directions in a sense. If someone wins a judgment against you, the judgment creditor cannot take your LLC interest (stock could be taken normally, subject to a stockholders' agreement). Instead, the creditor gets something called a charging order, which requires that distributions with respect to the LLC interest must be paid over to the judgment creditor. This is more protection for the other members than it is protection for you, but it's a nice feature versus partnership interests or stock.

Third, it is a legal person. It can sign contracts, sue, be sued, and do almost anything a natural person could do (except as limited by statute), including owning real or personal property.

In the scenario you describe, I would expect to see an LLC of which you and your financial parter are members, with an Operating Agreement providing for an unbalanced payout until he gets all his money back, plus some kind of interest premium (otherwise he loses money). That's your business. One of the keys is to make sure that there are no mandatory capital contributions under the agreement, otherwise you can get squeezed out by a big money partner and those liabilities are enforceable against you personally.

You might choose to form a second LLC, of which the first LLC and some store (probably an S corporation or LLC) are members, which will have an Operating Agreement with similar no mandatory contribution provisions and set forth the exact terms of your deal. This creates a second level of liability protection, but might be too much formality (including annual accounting expenses) when some kind of simple agreement might do the job better.

If you are serious, see a lawyer and an accountant to get you set up right initially. It is VASTLY cheaper than having those same people unscrew it later.

[NB: regarding liability. You must keep LLC assets separate from your own assets if you want to claim limited liability protection, and follow all the formalities required by the LLC Act under which you form the company and your Operating Agreement. If you don't, it's possible for a creditor to "pierce the veil" of limited liability and get at your personal assets.]

]]>
By: the_cardfather https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3643 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:57:44 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3643 @stu55 – What store owners should do and what many are willing to do are very different. There are many stores that want nothing to do with a singles market. They don't want to take the risk, the overhead in a product they don't understand and thier sales suffer for it. These are the same stores that never seem to be open past 5-6 pm.

Players gravitate to shops that have good singles because it shows the management is involved with the game. They have a place to sell the cards they get playing limited so they can play next week and open more packs.

Should the owner do it, or hire more staff? Yes. Maybe his time or credit is tapped out. Is getting a 3rd party to basically merchandise for you just as good or better since they actually have skin in the game? Yes. Most do take a % of sales or a kickback on boxes you crack. That's part of business. Just don't let it get out of control or you're in the company store. Nothing wrong with giving them 10-15% considering thier credit card machine is taking 4-5% off the top and you'd spend that much selling on eBay. If you are moving 10k in singles through thier store a month that's 1k extra in thier pocket for doing.. nada. Not only that, by working with you they keep you from opening a store 3 streets over and flushing them.

Grocery stores, convenience stores, mall stores et et all have 3rd party merchandisers. It's a business model that works. So while I agree that the store owners should do it, the piles of stores with $10 crap rares from 3 seasons ago tells me they aren't.

]]>
By: stu55 https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3641 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:14:20 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3641 @the_cardfather: I am going to have to 100% disagree with you that it is a win-win for a store owner to have some one set up in their store to sell singles. This takes away sales from him and the increase in floor traffic might get him a few more sleeve sells, but would take away a ton of money from him in pack sells.

I have worked as a consultant for 3 different stores for ways to increase attendance or as their buyer, and having an entity that doesn't directly put money into the store is the worst way to grow business, the store owner should just take out a loan and start singles for himself, no reason to let some one else make the money when they could be.

]]>
By: the_cardfather https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3639 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 07:19:30 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3639 The affiliated singles dealer model where you run one aspect of the game store semi-indepentant of the store itself is a pure win-win from a store owners perspective.

1) Little to no skin in the game for them. They have to cough up some unproductive rack/counter space and work you into thier PoS. You don't want that store to be part of your LLC. You want a contractual arrangement with your LLC. It changes your nature from "some random guy who comes into my shop to sell singles" to "Whinstons Mad Singles LLC is our affiliate partner."
2) He gets discounts on his purchases due to the amount of product you need to buy. At the same time you can't get discounted presale product w/out him. Watch out for store owners trying to gib you on this, although most people would still do healthy business being able to buy boxes for $5 over wholesale you don't really want to pay for the priviledge of selling cards in his shop.
3) This increases the owners floor traffic. People that buy singles buy packs to draft, or have friends that do. They want tournament space. I advise you to get set up as a T.O.

With all that said, this article mildly undermines your credability. It would have been better if Kelly had tag-teamed with you and written about what it takes to get started, or what it took to get him started highlighting the things he did well, and things he would do over.

]]>
By: VeritoAnimus https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3638 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:50:43 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3638 I can definitely see some of the recommendations you make, and I am a huge speculative trader. I've always been a budget player in that I basically never have money to spend on cards, but I've always managed to trade for anything I've needed allowing me to hold a lot of the same playsets and match games evenly with the big spenders. The #1 method and #1 time for a speculative trader is always rotation. Right before rotation you get to dump off everything you have that's rotating to the bigger spenders and strictly tournament traders for a diverse portfolio of cards you expect to be good post rotation. Then when rotation day hits, you get to trade back to the same people!!! trading the cards you picked up for 2-5 times what you had into them, getting the cards from the format you expect to regain value at half of what you traded them away for. At the end of the day you even end up with enough left over value to pick up the cards you'll need for the new set. If you're a great speculator you can even catch the cards other people haven't caught on to yet (I picked up Avenger of Zendikar as a $1 card, remember before people caught on that he was good… So do I)… Figuring these out can make a HUGE impact on the portfolio. And with the general laziness when it comes to deckbuilding anymore plus the short memories of major tournament players, you can count on there being some real gems to be found this way.

]]>
By: Acceptable Losses https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3637 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:10:51 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3637 While I understand and agree with your reasons for wanting to trade down for cards you're speculating on, from my experience, most people view trading down as a nuisance (due to less liquidity) and are willing to give a bit more to the person who's trading down for this reason. I think you could probably push this angle and gain a bit more value on a lot of your trades.

]]>
By: NoahWhinston https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3636 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:15:33 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3636 In reply to Cristopher Blanco.

i agree this could lead to a difficult situation. one of the problems with European markets is shipping, which can be expensive, as well as buyers who will want an English language card vs. one in their native language. re: the FTV R trade, i think my limit for it would be 3 Jaces and a Baneslayer for the 2 FTVs. that would break about even on value at the moment, but with a much higher potential for an increase in value in the long run, both because you are diversifying your portfolio, as well as trading 2 "cards" for 4

]]>
By: Cristopher Blanco https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3635 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:47:06 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3635 Thanks for the reply Noah. Really appreciatte it. Yeah it seems that it will be hard to get that trade. Heck ill even do it for 3 Jaces and a Bane Slayer or 2 lol. The hardest part is that i live in Puerto Rico and the fisical market for a Jace is extremly limited. I do ship worldwide, so i was thinking on focusing on a european market since they are limited for them. Any thoughts on how should i approach this collectors from foreign countries?

Again thanks for the reply and hope you have a nice day.

]]>
By: Noah Whinston https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3634 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:59:30 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3634 In reply to Jarrett.

No, i don't Jarrett. Gideon was never the best in U/W and i think he will actually reduce in price, especially with the printing of superior 5 cc 'walkers from Scars

]]>
By: Jarrett https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3633 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:49:33 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3633 Noah, with UW control being an expected contender in next standard season, do you expect the value of Gideon Jura increasing?

]]>
By: stu55 https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3632 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:59:57 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3632 You are a little off in your understanding in what a LLC is. A LLC limits the liability of owners of the business entity. It makes the business responsible for the business, and it keeps the owner's assets protected from the business if it were to go under. It doesn't really have anything to do with one of the owners of the LLC going under or not because the LLC is it's own entity away from the any of the owners other businesses.

Also, with that $10k in start-up, what do you hope to accomplish with that? I would never want to show up at a GP or event with less than $5-$8k to buy cards, $4k is only some random collection you can get off of a message board. For cardstock, I would want at least 4x of each Type 2 single as well as 4x of most extended singles. (If you want more help on this topic, just get my contact info from Kelly, I have done all aspects of the trade business and know most of the numbers)

]]>
By: Noah Whinston https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3631 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:08:57 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3631 In reply to Cristopher Blanco.

while that would be a trade i would do an instant, as you're picking up at least 20-40 dollars in value, i'm not sure if anyone would be willing to do that. if you can find someone to do this trade with, that would be great

]]>
By: Noah Whinston https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3630 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:05:38 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3630 In reply to Lunco.

yes, i like that trade a lot. it is a little risky as jace has potential to go up once pulse and other cheap planeswalker removal rotate out, but cobras and fetches should see a jump with a new format as well

]]>
By: Noah Whinston https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3629 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:04:37 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3629 In reply to Dan.

they were preselling for 100 each, which is the route i took. shoul be back up to 100 as the supply goes down

]]>
By: Cristopher Blanco https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/an-expedition-for-information/#comment-3628 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:40:00 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1712#comment-3628 I currently have 2 From the Vault Relics unopened. I really need 4 Jace 2.0 to finish my U/W Control deck for next season. Think there is a chance for a trade like this happening???

]]>