Comments on: The Revenue Review – Moving Monuments https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/the-revenue-review-moving-monuments/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:19:10 +0000 hourly 1 By: Keesha https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/the-revenue-review-moving-monuments/#comment-19455 Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:19:10 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1932#comment-19455 I am totally wowed and ppraeerd to take the next step now.

]]>
By: Gold Investing Exper https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/the-revenue-review-moving-monuments/#comment-5208 Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:32:05 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1932#comment-5208 Great article

I know how profitable gold investing can be. My brother made really good money doing just that, and myself I am making good money investing in gold.

I recommend to anyone who's thinking of starting to invest in gold to read a book or two on this topic, as there so many mistakes and blunders that are possible to make when you first start in this industry.

Thank you very much for sharing this with your us.

]]>
By: Adam https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/the-revenue-review-moving-monuments/#comment-3731 Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:52:34 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1932#comment-3731 I disagree; I vote to move Monuments. With all the new artifacts on the horizon, more and more decks will pack maindeck artifact hate (most likely at instant speed). Monument is at its best when your opponent has no answer to it. A well timed Naturalize can blow a Monument deck out of the water.

]]>
By: the_cardfather https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/the-revenue-review-moving-monuments/#comment-3730 Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:40:13 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1932#comment-3730 I agree with Monument. I also like Avenger of Zendikar for the same reason, although he's a little bit harder to get on the cheep.

I went looking for it, but I could have sworn one of the other writers here was saying to dump monuments.

For the record rare's aren't as bad in paper. I know plenty of people who were happy with Knight of the Reliquary and Noble Heirarch. Manlands might end up in this category, esp Colonades and Ravines.

]]>
By: JB https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/the-revenue-review-moving-monuments/#comment-3729 Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:43:43 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1932#comment-3729 Not sure what build you were running but disagree about the deck being unreliable. If you want a good look at what the deck is capable of just pick up Zvi's mono-green version from that block GP. It is extremely consistent and in my testing it had no trouble keeping up with the top standard decks, and that was without upgrading it at all from the block version. Add a second color, or maybe some new stuff from Scars/M11, and I am pretty sure the deck will be a major player.

]]>
By: CATS https://www.quietspeculation.com/2010/09/the-revenue-review-moving-monuments/#comment-3728 Fri, 17 Sep 2010 02:09:03 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=1932#comment-3728 That deck is pretty unreliable though. I tried it after the Pro Tour and it´s inconsistent draws left me losing with it left and right.
Monument might still come out as a star, we have seen enough interactions out of Scars to make it worth playing. Myrball can use it and Grand architect as well. Giving it shroud with the Metalcraft Angel can be really evil as well.

]]>