Comments on: Insider: There’s Something About Jace https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Tue, 18 Jan 2022 02:54:31 +0000 hourly 1 By: Kelly Reid https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/#comment-37620 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:41:27 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=33603#comment-37620 god i hope they never unban jace in Modern. why would they do that!?

]]>
By: Paul Feudo https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/#comment-37573 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 21:01:01 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=33603#comment-37573 In reply to Tucker McGownd.

I think the presence of combo in modern would do as much if not more than bloodbraid elf to keep jace in check personally. Everytime Modern is played by pros it seems like the same list of cards are called to be unbanned in order to make control more viable, Jace usually being at the head of the list.

]]>
By: Tucker McGownd https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/#comment-37572 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:50:24 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=33603#comment-37572 I see it as unlikely that it gets unbanned. Tarmogoyf is 100 dollars and played in legacy and modern, Jace is 100 dollars and only played in legacy. If he were unbanned in Modern, I think the argument that bloodbraid elf and lightning bolt keep him in check is ridiculous. After all, he was kept in check before, and became a 100 dollar card while lightning bolt was legal- why unban a card with so much potential to destroy a format? If unbanned, the price becomes unfathomable. The limits to its price would be hard to wrap one’s head around. If unbanned, I will be horrified with Wizard’s lack of forsight.

]]>
By: Paul Feudo https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/#comment-37571 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:45:22 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=33603#comment-37571 In reply to Paul Feudo.

*them being Wizards >.<

]]>
By: Paul Feudo https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/#comment-37570 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:42:36 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=33603#comment-37570 In reply to Paul Feudo.

One of the problems with Modern before this year was a perceived barrier to entry that was much higher than the real one from semi competitive players who assumed every deck had 10-12 shock lands which combined with $30 steam vent was very intimidating. Expecting them to create similar situations after all the work they’ve done making the format feel accessible is ludicrous.

]]>
By: Paul Feudo https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/#comment-37568 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:32:57 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=33603#comment-37568 In reply to Mathieu Malecot.

Modern Mastery (and is $7 msrp) itself is evidence of wizards taking price/ the secondary market into account in my opinion.

This article is a warning about a costly play I’m seeing evidence of in the market but don’t agree with. I provided said evidence and gave my opinion and the reasoning behind it, I’m sorry if this is unsatisfactory.

]]>
By: Mathieu Malecot https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/#comment-37564 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:09:16 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=33603#comment-37564 In reply to Mathieu Malecot.

since the forums aren’t directly linking from here, look for sure bets (long term) under General Magic Discussion.

]]>
By: Mathieu Malecot https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/#comment-37563 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:07:10 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=33603#comment-37563 In reply to Paul Feudo.

use the link i provided. also, something can be worth talking about here and on the forums 🙂

QED does a really good job in the link of articulating an approach to mtg investment. his approach could actually serve the reader with a way to invest.

this article links some card prices and talks about what if Jace gets un-banned and previous prices. there is not much actionable content unless i am missing it. also, wizards isn’t going to make card choices considering price. they are going to want healthy formats to sell into and that’s it imo.

]]>
By: Paul Feudo https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/#comment-37558 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:19:15 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=33603#comment-37558 In reply to Alex Gislason.

Miracles is the only one with consistent sustained success I believe, the others are fairly fringe.

]]>
By: Paul Feudo https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/#comment-37557 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:18:06 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=33603#comment-37557 I haven’t been able to find the thread and/or posts you’re referring to, I certainly didn’t intend to rehash already known information if that’s the case. Regardless, the pricing trend hasn’t stopped, Jace is up to $73 on BLP, so I figured it was worth talking about.

]]>
By: Mathieu Malecot https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/#comment-37554 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:20:08 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=33603#comment-37554 here is the link:

link:

http://www.quietspeculation.com/forum/index.php/t

]]>
By: Alex Gislason https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/#comment-37548 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:13:53 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=33603#comment-37548 I think more decks in legacy besides Miracles started playing this. It has showed up in some Omni Tell decks and that new tesseret deck ( I know tezz isnt a real deck yet tho)

]]>
By: aregand https://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/11/insider-theres-something-about-jace/#comment-37546 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:38:32 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=33603#comment-37546 More Cubes needed Jace ? Can’t think of any other reasons besides the ones you listed. Wonder how many of those sold are going to speculators ?

]]>