Comments on: Insider: Gatecrash Rare Review https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/01/insider-gatecrash-rare-review/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Tue, 18 Jan 2022 02:46:10 +0000 hourly 1 By: potentdraught https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/01/insider-gatecrash-rare-review/#comment-42580 Thu, 31 Jan 2013 06:28:54 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=35834#comment-42580 I get where you’re coming from on this but if wizards was really paying that close attention to the price of format staples, don’t you think they’d have worked harder to bring down the price of fetchlands?

]]> By: Mathieu Malecot https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/01/insider-gatecrash-rare-review/#comment-42572 Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:49:13 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=35834#comment-42572 John, if you can flip reckoner and aurelia good for you. i would like to hear your reasoning for expecting a reprint, especially considering the duals in core sets and their rarity. shocklands have a long price history thanks to RAV and long term i expect lands to get to around 15 conservatively. they exceeded that before reprinting on much lighter demand. they will always be a part of Modern and i expect Modern to grow as a format. more players= more demand.

do you really think there is no connection with fetch and shock prices? you know what’s depressing the prices just like we all do: supply. guess what, that won’t last forever but demand will.

]]> By: Corbin Hosler https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/01/insider-gatecrash-rare-review/#comment-42566 Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:30:29 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=35834#comment-42566 Sorry John, can’t agree with you here. I’m with Chad on the Shocks train. Sure it sucks that we got in at 8-9 when it could have been 6-8, but when they double in price a year or two or three from now, I’m not going to be that upset that I didn’t get in on all my copies at the absolute floor.

]]>