Comments on: Insider: MTGO Grab Bag https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/03/insider-mtgo-grab-bag/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Tue, 18 Jan 2022 02:46:04 +0000 hourly 1 By: maxiewawa https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/03/insider-mtgo-grab-bag/#comment-46978 Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:01:13 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=36749#comment-46978 In reply to Matthew Lewis.

Yes, completely, thanks!

I always like how you compare past with present to draw conclusions on the future. Much more helpful than “x doesn’t seem like a $2 card IMHO I bought up 50 and u should too”.

Ta again and keep up the good work.

]]>
By: Matthew Lewis https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/03/insider-mtgo-grab-bag/#comment-46951 Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:05:44 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=36749#comment-46951 In reply to koen_knx.

To the best of my memory, yes, they were the first ZZW queues since ZEN block rotated out of Standard.

]]>
By: koen_knx https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/03/insider-mtgo-grab-bag/#comment-46886 Sat, 16 Mar 2013 07:35:58 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=36749#comment-46886 Was the january-zendikar-draft the first ZZW since the set rotated out ? Otherwise would be interesting to look at the price charts at the time of the first newdraft.

]]>
By: Matthew Lewis https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/03/insider-mtgo-grab-bag/#comment-46821 Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:45:25 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=36749#comment-46821 In reply to Matthew Lewis.

Ok, that link doesn’t work properly. Just look up my Aug 17th article manually if you are curious.

]]>
By: Matthew Lewis https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/03/insider-mtgo-grab-bag/#comment-46819 Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:44:45 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=36749#comment-46819 In reply to maxiewawa.

Great question! Admittedly it’s not obvious from the table here and that’s my mistake. But if you go back to my Aug 17th 2012 article, there’s a longer list that has the ratio for ZEN, WWK and ROE. Find it here,

http://www.quietspeculation.com/2012/08/insider-w

Those numbers are what guide me for how sets that have rotated out of Standard but are still available for redemption might move in price. Back then, ZEN was at 0.54, WWK at 0.74 and ROE was at 0.77. Comparing where SOM and MBS were in November suggests that they. had room to rise in price. At their current ratio levels, there’s probably not much upside left.

Hopefully this clarified where I was coming from. All ratio values need to be compared to sets that are similar. In other words, comparing where the ZEN block sets were last summer suggested to me where the Scars block sets might be going. When thinking about the ratio values and the signal implied, this is what I had in mind.

Is that a bit clearer?

]]>
By: maxiewawa https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/03/insider-mtgo-grab-bag/#comment-46813 Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:59:53 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=36749#comment-46813 “If you consider where the ratio stood for the Scars of Mirrodin sets back on November 14th, the signal was to buy Scars of Mirrodin (SOM) and Mirrodin Besieged (MBS) mythics over New Phyrexia (NPH) mythics. ”

So… The “signal” you mentioned was that 0.45 (SOM) and 0.39 (MBS) were low? I don’t get it… Lower than what? RTR was 0.39 as well, why wasn’t that good value?? Obviously you were right, but I don’t quite follow what you mean by “signal”.

]]>
By: Matthew Lewis https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/03/insider-mtgo-grab-bag/#comment-46774 Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:59:00 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=36749#comment-46774 In reply to Alexander Carl.

Thanks for reading!

]]>
By: Alexander Carl https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/03/insider-mtgo-grab-bag/#comment-46769 Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:49:07 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=36749#comment-46769 Great article–thanks for the insights into how to analyze these markets!

]]>
By: Matthew Lewis https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/03/insider-mtgo-grab-bag/#comment-46740 Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:24:47 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=36749#comment-46740 In reply to Justin Smith.

Pyromancer Ascension based decks are not necessarily building storm count in the same way as Past in Flames. Here’s an example.

http://i.imgur.com/8tET5pt.jpg

]]>
By: Justin Smith https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/03/insider-mtgo-grab-bag/#comment-46731 Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:27:13 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=36749#comment-46731 “Seething Song not an integral part to the deck”…this seems wrong, I was under the impression that Storm is pretty much dead as a deck without it.

]]>