Comments on: Insider: GP Las Vegas https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/06/insider-gp-las-vegas/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Tue, 18 Jan 2022 02:43:43 +0000 hourly 1 By: David Schumann https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/06/insider-gp-las-vegas/#comment-58313 Sun, 30 Jun 2013 19:22:52 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=39222#comment-58313 In reply to Vincent Pascoe.

Thanks. This was the first major event I’ve ever flown to (I usually travel to all the ones in Charlotte/Atlanta/Charleston), thus we’ve always had a car available. I learned a whole lot of new things on this trip and wanted to let everyone else avoid some of the pitfalls.

]]>
By: Vincent Pascoe https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/06/insider-gp-las-vegas/#comment-58290 Sun, 30 Jun 2013 03:21:10 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=39222#comment-58290 really nice to the point and loved all the extramoney saveing GP tips…

]]>
By: David Schumann https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/06/insider-gp-las-vegas/#comment-58288 Sun, 30 Jun 2013 03:08:12 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=39222#comment-58288 In reply to Mathieu Malecot.

That might explain it…it was still pretty funny to see the dealers next to SCG offering $85 and SCG offering $100 though…obviously those dealers had none in stock.

]]>
By: Mathieu Malecot https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/06/insider-gp-las-vegas/#comment-58251 Sat, 29 Jun 2013 03:51:37 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=39222#comment-58251 SCG was buying from other retailors at 110 1st day. not individuals.

]]>
By: David Schumann https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/06/insider-gp-las-vegas/#comment-58244 Sat, 29 Jun 2013 00:26:31 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=39222#comment-58244 In reply to Corbin Hosler.

Thanks…I certainly learned quite a bit (this is probably the first real trip I’ve been on that wasn’t company paid for…so the costs were important to me) and figured I could save others the trouble/surprise when it comes to extra costs.

]]>
By: Kyle Falbo https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/06/insider-gp-las-vegas/#comment-58237 Fri, 28 Jun 2013 20:03:19 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=39222#comment-58237 Name/Number Crunch leaves no room for any form of a dual cycle in M14.

]]>
By: Sean Choate https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/06/insider-gp-las-vegas/#comment-58236 Fri, 28 Jun 2013 20:00:54 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=39222#comment-58236 In reply to Corbin Hosler.

There’s no room in the MTG Salvation name & number crunch.

Vial of Poison is number 225, number 226 is probably an artifact and Mutavault is 228, Shimmering Grotto is 229, and 230 is the first basic land. There’s room for one, maybe two more lands.

]]>
By: aregand https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/06/insider-gp-las-vegas/#comment-58235 Fri, 28 Jun 2013 19:59:17 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=39222#comment-58235 In reply to Corbin Hosler.

I think by name / number crunching they and any other 5 land cycle are out from what I remember unless they have fewer basic lands than recent sets.

]]>
By: Corbin Hosler https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/06/insider-gp-las-vegas/#comment-58233 Fri, 28 Jun 2013 19:09:14 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=39222#comment-58233 Nice recap, and I like the “other costs” section. Also, where was it said buddy lands aren’t in M14?

]]>