It’s possible that is the case yes, but I don’t think so. There were no games where I mulliganned aggressively and won that I considered wrong. You do bring up a valid point though. Thinking back, I think subconsciously Melira Pod was the deck I was the most afraid of because of Voice. That may have led me to making mulligan decisions based on fear rather than what an acceptable hand is. I recall one hand I mulliganned against pod though. The seven had no lands and the six had one land, delver, snapcaster, serum visions, and two other cards that were not removal spells. That is the hand I think I should have kept because going to five is worse than that hand. Granted, it needs some help to win, like drawing a turn one land for example and then seeing good cards with serum visions, but I think keeping it is better than going to five.

Are we being too results oriented here?