Comments on: Insider: MTGO Market Crash https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/11/insider-mtgo-market-crash/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Tue, 18 Jan 2022 02:40:48 +0000 hourly 1 By: Matthew Lewis https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/11/insider-mtgo-market-crash/#comment-70031 Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:44:40 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=42013#comment-70031 In reply to Mistrblank.

Good point! I’m not really familiar with back end logistics, so I’m lumping all issues (infrastructure, client, UI, etc) into generic ‘client’ issues. If I’m not using the terminology correctly, please forgive my ignorance.

]]> By: Mistrblank https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/11/insider-mtgo-market-crash/#comment-70029 Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:05:33 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=42013#comment-70029 It’s not JUST the state of the client. The tournament issues are a SERVER issue. And they should have been squashed before pushing people to a new client. Part of their development process was to rebuild the server code and make it stable with the old client and implement “features” that would be useful in the next client but required server side. This should be done, it should be tested, it’s not.

]]>