I only read the Insider content, so I’d rather see this included in the Insider section then miss out on it entirely.

I’m not particularly well versed in poker terminology. My first association was with “fish” in the con men world, which is not a particularly good thing to be. I did reckon there’d be another context though, so I did not really have a problem with using “fish”. It’s really only “shark” that stands out because it already has a different usage in MTG Finance.

You’re welcome. I do try to not only post comments, but also to help.

Have you looked at the forums? Many state they alone are worth the membership fee.

There’s also a large article backlog to browse through.

Context is what makes content. English as a language is a prime example of how often that is use, unfortunately. I personally don’t feel this is a losing battle or that it’s not going to effect change, as anything that changes a negative into a positive only needs to start with one person. If I can only impact one person in viewing the word differently – then I’ve created positive change.

Thank you for the feedback, though.

“Fish” was just using Poker terms because many identify with poker terminology as well. But I like how you’re thinking constructively. Thank you.

I agree. It’s all in the mindset. The only reason it has a negative connotation is because at one point in time it became synonymous. Changing that is starts with just one person changing it.

Where would you like to see the content at? Being new myself, I’d like more feedback on what your expectations are. You can have a big part of where I take this particular column if you’d like to give me some feedback on what you’re looking for.

Thank you

Agreed.

Ya my $11.99 has not been worth it so far.

Using the same word for a different content is not going to work as this one is fairly established by the mtg community.

Agreed on this one. I liked the descriptions for everything else, but shark also jumped out at me.