Comments on: On “Greasiness” https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/10/on-greasiness/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Mon, 27 Oct 2014 05:12:31 +0000 hourly 1 By: Derek Madlem https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/10/on-greasiness/#comment-226375 Mon, 27 Oct 2014 05:12:31 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=53019#comment-226375 In reply to Kelly Reid.

I’m on board with this as well. Ask your opponent to play faster, if they don’t you can call a judge over to ensure that no slow play is occurring. Play faster yourself, an opponent playing slow gives you plenty of time to plan out your entire next turn based on a variety of plays on their parts / draws on your own part.

]]>
By: Jason Alt https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/10/on-greasiness/#comment-219233 Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:47:06 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=53019#comment-219233 In reply to Toby Russell.

Because that guy’s breakers sucked and the only way he had a chance of getting Top 8 was if both of the people above him knocked themselves out of contention, something that wouldn’t happen if either Player A or Player B won their match. That guy didn’t have a prize snatched out of his hands, he just didn’t benefit from an extremely rare scenario where both people who would make Top 8 over him both didn’t get Top 8 because they eliminated each other.

]]>
By: Jason Alt https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/10/on-greasiness/#comment-219225 Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:44:09 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=53019#comment-219225 In reply to Fred.

That guy didn’t miss out on Top 8 because “some loser scooped”, though. In most cases, someone will win and someone will lose that matchup. Draws are rare in that case. This person didn’t lose out on Top 8 because someone scooped, they lost out on Top 8 because their record and breakers weren’t good enough and they wouldn’t have gotten Top 8 if that match had concluded with one of those people with better breakers winning, something that happens more often than not. If you’re relying on the people above you to draw and knock both people out of contention, you didn’t really have a shot.

]]>
By: ExpletiveDelete https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/10/on-greasiness/#comment-219197 Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:30:06 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=53019#comment-219197 In reply to Kelly Reid.

Wow, cutthroat… But also I agree 100%

]]>
By: Kelly Reid https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/10/on-greasiness/#comment-219074 Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:05:08 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=53019#comment-219074 My goal in a tournament is to finish as highly as possible and to maximize my game win/loss ratio. The arbitrary cut to a Top 8 is a frustrating reality, and I say this as the guy who went 7-1-1, 9th place, at the largest SCG Open before they changed the attendance / round caps.

I’m not concerned with the EV of the combination of both players. I’m not concerned with paying it forward. I am here to win games of Magic, and if we cannot finish a best-of-three series with a decisive winner or loser, then the match is a draw.

I understand why this is different at the Pro level (a level I will never attain), where there is a significant amount of repeat matchups and a much better understanding of the game theory / EV behind these situations.

Below that pro level, however, you’re still engaging in a meta-game that I have no patience for. You don’t want to draw? Play faster. You can’t play faster? Practice more with your deck. Can’t practice more? Play faster and lose because I put in the work to be better than you.

Also, people need to get way better about calling Slow Play on opponents. I try to balance between reminding them to play at a faster pace, and avoiding breaking their train of thought. Sure, I could be cutthroat and try to distract them, but my goal is to get them to play faster, not worse. I’d rather them hurry to the right decision than slowly deliberate themselves into a blunder.

]]>
By: Toby Russell https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/10/on-greasiness/#comment-219047 Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:52:04 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=53019#comment-219047 I don’t know why the guy who would have got into top 8 had you not conceded doesn’t seem to get a mention here.

I personally would not concede due to this fact and it baffles me why it seems to be OK to screw someone who isn’t directly in front of you but frowned upon to play the game to the best of your ability to determine the true outcome of the tournament.

It’s not a case of “why should I if I don’t get anything out of it” for everyone, some of us care a great deal about integrity and how our actions can affect encompassing situations rather than just the ones in front of our faces.

]]>
By: Frank https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/10/on-greasiness/#comment-219020 Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:38:05 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=53019#comment-219020 I’d scoop if its helps to put someone who worked for it in the top 8 because I’d expect the same courtesy to be done to me. Magic players for the most part are very honorable.
Arguing about people who get screwed out of packs is just arguing shoulda coulda wouldas.

]]>
By: Frank https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/10/on-greasiness/#comment-219013 Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:35:31 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=53019#comment-219013 In reply to Brett.

Pretty much. Its just the outside looking in.

]]>
By: Krond https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/10/on-greasiness/#comment-218959 Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:16:04 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=53019#comment-218959 Over my years playing Magic, I’ve learned to get the conversation about concession started early. If game 1 is pushing past 20 minutes, or I suspect that my current match up might go to time, I’ll just ask my opponent early, ‘Hey, would like you to agree that there will be a winner of this match?’

Some times they’ll agree flat out, sometimes they’ll ask how we should decide. I usually say something along the lines of, ‘We can be gentlemen about it, and agree based on board state, or if there is a clear winner on the following turn. I’ll even show you my hand at the end of Turn 5.’ Even if they don’t agree right away, at least the thought is in their head.

And yes, I realize my opponent could lie, and say that we’ll decide a winner, and then not scoop to my on-board lethal, and there’s nothing I can do to ensure that they keep their promise. But you know what? That hasn’t happened in years. I’ve scooped up many draws this way, and had many scooped to me.

I’ve found that starting the process early, and being honest and friendly about it has served me quite well.

]]>
By: Fred https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/10/on-greasiness/#comment-218951 Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:11:42 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=53019#comment-218951 Sure some guy scoops to give you a free pass into the top 8. It also means that someone else missed out on top 8 because some guy scoops to give you that free pass.
There are two expectations at work here: the guy who expects the scoop so he can waltz into the top 8 and the guy who expects you to play your best so he can have a chance of his own for top 8.
Here’s a quote from someone who shall remain nameless: “I missed out on top 8 because some loser scooped for packs.”
Who is the greasy one in that scenario?

]]>
By: Jason Alt https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/10/on-greasiness/#comment-218939 Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:02:43 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=53019#comment-218939 In reply to Brett.

Bingo. That is a great observation, but I think a portion of it stems from people who haven’t been in Top 8 contention not knowing the moves, also.

]]>
By: Brett https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/10/on-greasiness/#comment-218829 Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:44:10 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=53019#comment-218829 I think a lot of it comes down to the noncompetitive crowd looking in on the competitive scene and honestly just not understanding it.

]]>