Spoiler alert! This is definitely the next step and articles are in the works that will discuss this. My article for today, publishing in about 1.5 hours, does just this for one of the format’s coolest new decks. Sample size starts to become an issue when calculating matchups, but as long as a deck has at least 10 or so appearances, we can get some sense of MWPs against specific decks. I also try to incorporate this data in the explanations for why decks are doing well, so you can see some of this interspersed throughout the article.

We can go even further:
Winrates on the play, winrate on the draw in each matchup.
Winrate Preboard, winrate Postboard.

And NOW i will look for EsperMentor lists, because you got me fixed….Damn YOU!

greets Tyrannon

@ Trollistar and Capn: Thanks for your support on the site! We’re trying to keep our content quality high, so let us know if there’s anything more (or less) you want to see.

As for reddit, just want to echo what Sean said. Feel free to post any of the links to spark off discussion.

That’s not a bad idea at all. I think there are probably a few ways to pool small N decks that would make sense. As long as the rogue decks had relatively similar plans, even if their cards weren’t the same, we could probably group them without too much danger. I’ll look into it and see if there’s anything worth reporting!

Thanks very much!

We fully encourage people to post/link our content to reddit as appropriate. We’re allowed to submit it ourselves provided we are active redditors and not just posting and leaving (though even then, some people get away with it). We submitted our “launch post” there and articles have been submitted by others, all to great reception, so please do!

Just wanted to agree with Capn – I was a bit skeptical at first, but the content is incredibly good so far. Keep up the good work!

1) I’ve been surprised and impressed by the quality of content here. The bold claim of “The Premiere site for Modern” has actually been substantiated nicely.

2) Do the rules of the /r/spikes forum allow posters to reference your articles to springboard discussions? I know that content creators can’t spam their work onto reddit or they get banned, and I’m not sure how you guys feel about potentially moving discussion of articles onto a forum not your own.