Comments on: Tiny Tuesday- Anafenza Maverick https://www.quietspeculation.com/2015/05/tiny-tuesday-anafenza-maverick/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:48:18 +0000 hourly 1 By: kredit in höhe von 300.000 https://www.quietspeculation.com/2015/05/tiny-tuesday-anafenza-maverick/#comment-1843570 Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:48:18 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=59646#comment-1843570 In reply to Ryan Overturf.

Dec12 When I initially commented I clicked the Notify me any time new comments are added checkbox and currently every time a comment is added I get four email messages with the same comment.

]]>
By: Trish https://www.quietspeculation.com/2015/05/tiny-tuesday-anafenza-maverick/#comment-1825186 Thu, 22 Dec 2016 23:23:23 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=59646#comment-1825186 In reply to Ryan Overturf.

FLIf you live in Florida you should be aware that all court room prdeecoings are open to the public. The only exceptions are very sensitive matters, usually involving juveniles, which are handled in Chambers.

]]>
By: T Sigouin https://www.quietspeculation.com/2015/05/tiny-tuesday-anafenza-maverick/#comment-691913 Wed, 06 May 2015 16:34:52 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=59646#comment-691913 I have a very similar deck I just run a few spells that are different, and obviously no karakas. I have toyed with the idea of using kotr to fetch up man lands like stirring wildwood ect. but fear it will water down the mana base. I love the flexibility of a card like Shred Memory/Dimir Machinations in the format as well, pseudo tutor with a really relevant ability. Veil, Decay, and Swords with Den protector/witness recursion should be fine as a removal package accented by pulse/vindicate. Smother shouldn’t be needed in a 3 colour deck where you have access to so many other great removal pieces. I kind of think it’s redundant to have pulse charm and vindicate I’d suggest something like Read the Bones or Night’s Whisper but thats just my preferred style.

]]>
By: Ryan Overturf https://www.quietspeculation.com/2015/05/tiny-tuesday-anafenza-maverick/#comment-687436 Tue, 05 May 2015 19:34:19 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=59646#comment-687436 In reply to David Schumann.

I wouldn’t count on Anafenza just living all the time. With this deck’s curve, one mana is much preferred to two as well.

]]>
By: David Schumann https://www.quietspeculation.com/2015/05/tiny-tuesday-anafenza-maverick/#comment-687316 Tue, 05 May 2015 18:55:25 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=59646#comment-687316 In reply to Ryan Overturf.

Except with Anafenza out…all kill spells “exile”

]]>
By: Ryan Overturf https://www.quietspeculation.com/2015/05/tiny-tuesday-anafenza-maverick/#comment-686432 Tue, 05 May 2015 14:58:52 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=59646#comment-686432 In reply to CorwinB.

Further embarrassment! I thought I had both discard spells.

The reason I don’t have smother is that exiling seems to have better mileage than smother, so I prefer the white removals for creatures.

]]>
By: CorwinB https://www.quietspeculation.com/2015/05/tiny-tuesday-anafenza-maverick/#comment-686241 Tue, 05 May 2015 13:55:31 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=59646#comment-686241 Isn’t Inquisition of Kozilek a better card than Thoughtseize in the format (not that you can’t run both…) ?

I’d also say Smother is nearly an auto-include in any TL deck running black…

You can replace the Karakas with Sejiri Steppe for a nice one-shot protection if you have KotR out…

]]>
By: Ryan Overturf https://www.quietspeculation.com/2015/05/tiny-tuesday-anafenza-maverick/#comment-685795 Tue, 05 May 2015 11:59:50 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=59646#comment-685795 It would appear that you are correct. Well, this is awkward. XD

This certainly makes Knight worse, but I don’t think it changes the deck. -Karakas +fetchland I suppose. Good call!

]]>