Comments on: Turn Four Ulamog: Reshaping Modern with Eldrazi Stompy https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:02:40 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123434 Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:02:40 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123434 In reply to Andrew.

Thank you!! Glad you got those Chalices 😉

]]>
By: Andrew https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123433 Mon, 08 Feb 2016 03:01:02 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123433 Congrats on essentially calling it and coming up with the best deck in Modern right now, long before the pros did. I knew you were on to something and I’m so glad I picked up a couple Chalices a week ago after reading your article. Thanks for the great content and keep it up!

]]>
By: Chris Striker https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123432 Tue, 02 Feb 2016 23:01:38 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123432 In reply to Tdog.

Been playing a variant. Endless One is a 3 of for me right now, because he does wonders for curving out hands more consistently. I cut 2 conduits and an Oblivion sower for them because you really don’t need to go any bigger than Reshaper into Thought Knot into Smasher. I also ended up cutting the second Ulamog for a Dread Defiler because you can cast him and activate his ability once on turn 4 with the right setup, and he provides a non-combat oriented way to deal damage. He’s also much less of a dead draw cf the Ulamog, who has often been a dead draw. Getting to 10 on turn 4 largely isn’t worthwhile.

]]>
By: Tdog https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123431 Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:24:47 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123431 Has anyone done any testing with this? Deck seems really good.

]]>
By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123430 Mon, 25 Jan 2016 04:11:21 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123430 In reply to Francis Jodoin.

There’s just no reason not to play a few black cards. Since we’re in Urborg anyway, we might as well run insane cards like Liliana of the Veil and Dismember.

]]>
By: Alex https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123429 Sun, 24 Jan 2016 23:46:48 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123429 In reply to Francis Jodoin.

Why would you do that? What good is it? If you want to for the sake of budget or whatever, try it out and see how it goes.

The idea of cutting black altogether does not seems to have few merits related to winning games though.

]]>
By: Tyson Schmidt https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123428 Sun, 24 Jan 2016 03:07:47 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123428 In reply to Jordan Boisvert.

Fair enough. Keep us posted of any updates!

]]>
By: Francis Jodoin https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123427 Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:44:38 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123427 I’ve also shifted away from processors and i just built a similar deck (with iok no chalice, with map no lili and with mind stone no serum).

So this got me thinking, do you think a mono colorless version could be good? You still keep urborgs (for eye) but go mono colorless lands with maybe 2-3 wastes and just value lands. You could swap lili for something else, like endless ones and warping wail.

Doable?

]]>
By: vincentleeuwen https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123426 Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:29:27 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123426 Hi there,

Thanks for a great article! List looks awesome. What are your results against linear stuff like Infect and Zoo?

Also, what are your thoughts on including a few simian spirit guides to play t1 chalice?

]]>
By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123425 Fri, 22 Jan 2016 07:40:20 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123425 In reply to Tyson Schmidt.

Agree that IOK is sweet, but I’m not willing to make that compromise. We can keep seven-land hands and dominate opponents. Odds of that happening decrease dramatically with “dead” draws in the deck.

]]>
By: Tyson Schmidt https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123424 Wed, 20 Jan 2016 07:02:33 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123424 COOOOOOL DECK.
But question; why no Inquisition of Kozilek? I understand it’s dead with Chalice on the battlefield but t1 IoK into t2 Chalice/Thought-Knot is backbreaking. Surely you must be willing to make the compromise. Not only that but discard tools are incredibly powerful with Liliana and CRAZY with Reality Smasher/Thought-Knot.

]]>
By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123423 Tue, 19 Jan 2016 04:23:20 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123423 In reply to Swifty McGee.

Caverns + Temple

]]>
By: Swifty McGee https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123422 Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:50:09 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123422 Nice deck, although I have one question. Gemstone Caverns taps for one of any color instead of with a luck counter, right? Meaning, you can’t actually cast Matter Reshaper turn one? Or am I misreading the card?

]]>
By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123421 Mon, 18 Jan 2016 02:42:02 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123421 In reply to naoto469ma.

I still like her. She’s a house in the mirror and against most aggro decks. I’m running a Crucible for extra points vs. big mana decks instead of the second Cranial Extraction now that Twin is gone.

]]>
By: naoto469ma https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123420 Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:47:24 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123420 Nice deck. Any changes to the list after the recent banning? Also, how are u finding lotv? In my minimal testing she is feeling like a dead card most of the time due to a lack of black mana. The same could be said for any card requiring BB.

]]>
By: I want to talk to Sampson https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123419 Sat, 16 Jan 2016 07:18:06 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123419 In reply to Jordan Boisvert.

Good point. Right now it’s kind of a placeholder for matter reshaper and will go away in a week. 🙂

]]>
By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123418 Sat, 16 Jan 2016 06:00:09 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123418 In reply to Roland F. Rivera Santiago.

Hasn’t been annoying for me. Thought-Knot costs two mana in this deck; Remand is supposed to net the caster mana. Doesn’t matter nobody will play Remand anymore because Splinter Twin is banned LOL

]]>
By: Roland F. Rivera Santiago https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123417 Sat, 16 Jan 2016 05:05:43 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123417 In reply to Jordan Boisvert.

I see that, but I don’t see why it isn’t a Cavern of Souls, especially given that getting a Thought-Knot Seer caught by a Remand or something can be annoying.

]]>
By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123416 Sat, 16 Jan 2016 02:24:39 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123416 In reply to Roland F. Rivera Santiago.

Conduits can be clunky. Moving forward, I’m cutting one for the 25th land: Sea-Gate Wreckage. Went over Wastes in the article.

]]>
By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/01/turn-four-ulamog-reshaping-modern-with-eldrazi-stompy/#comment-2123415 Sat, 16 Jan 2016 02:19:41 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=6609#comment-2123415 In reply to I want to talk to Sampson.

Heartless makes your Thought-Knots die to Bolt, so I don’t think it’s worth playing. Like Map, it’s another “ramping tool” that slows us down. Powder lets us make real plays every turn of the game.

]]>