Comments on: I’ll Take It: SCG Regionals Report https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:57:45 +0000 hourly 1 By: Anonymous https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124344 Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:57:45 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124344 I love the idea of UW Merfolk but my experience has been once my oppenent knows that I don’t play any basic plains in the deck they almost always ghost quarter my white source, leaving path and worship stranded in my hand many times.

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124343 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:19:45 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124343 In reply to Anonymous.

Pre-Ugin you are entirely correct, post-Ugin Tec Edge is a little slow. In my experience when Tron plays its fourth land they will be able to Ugin even if you’ve Spread them already thanks to Nature’s Claim post-board. I think Eldrazi is likely enough to supplant Tron for the moment not to worry about, but you are right the board needs work now that the metagame has proven to be very different than I was expecting. How it will change will depend on what happens at the SCG events over the next couple weeks.

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124342 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:14:28 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124342 In reply to Rick.

Meddling Mage has been for combo decks, especially Grishoalbrand and Scapeshift. It is a probable cut if the trend is away from those decks towards Chord of Calling decks and Eldrazi.

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124341 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:50:47 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124341 In reply to Hurfsome.

Thank you! I also hope to have worthy results to write about soon!

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124340 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:50:00 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124340 In reply to Brad Ross.

Very good games to you too, and good luck in the future!

]]>
By: Brad Ross https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124339 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:46:42 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124339 The Brad with the RG burn deck was me. I’m Brad Ross from Colorado Springs and it was a pleasure to play you, even if you taught me why the forge tender is so good and warrants the white splash for path! Good game sir!

]]>
By: Rick https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124338 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:10:05 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124338 What do you use Meddling Mage for?

]]>
By: Anonymous https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124337 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 06:23:54 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124337 I can definitely appreciate the idea of using sea’s claim as extra land disruption vs eldrazi. that being said if you’re going to stay UW then I think I would lean towards -2 Hibernation +2 Sea’s Claim in the board. perhaps taking out Hibernation entirely and running 3 sea’s claim. But I don’t think you want to be cutting much else in the maindeck to play sea’s claim. I think Kira can go entirely. adding the 4th harbinger of the tides and the 3rd master of waves.

if you should decide to go mono blue, then I would start with the spell base of 4 AEther Vial, 4 Spreading Seas, 2 Sea’s Claim, 2 Echoing Truth/Dismember. Not sure which is better to have at the moment Echoing Truth or Dismember. However in UW with Path to Exile at the ready, Echoing Truth adds a ton of utility since it can be saved for bouncing other problematic permanants. Path to Exile is needed so badly right now that I think going mono blue might be a mistake.

So I don’t see where the room is to add Sea’s Claim to the maindeck which means I think it would be fine as a 2 or 3 of in the sideboard for this deck going forward. But main or side, I think Merfolk is definitely going to want to run some number of copies of Sea’s Claim in it’s 75 to supplement Spreading Seas.

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124336 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 05:34:56 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124336 In reply to Kris.

I was a college debater so I have a lot of experience writing very fast and staying focused on the game. I use shorthand notes for each lifetotal changes and note the important play sequences so that I can recreate them afterwards. Judges encourage note taking to help sort out disputes so this really just grew from me protecting myself against bad judge calls.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124335 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 05:22:36 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124335 In reply to David Ernenwein.

Without tec edge (or ghost quarter) you are going to lose to RG tron everytime – 4x spreading seas will not get you there. Similarly your midrange three colour matchups suffer from no tec edge. What are you boarding out – if you board out vials – your sb needs a ton of work to be honest..

]]>
By: Anonymous https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124334 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 05:20:00 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124334 In reply to Anonymous.

I disagree. Even though I think that UW merfolk is the least optimal build it doesn’t come up that often on here. The twin discussion was necessary and the reasons for its ban were not strong.

The RUG delver stuff is pretty much correct though

]]>
By: Kris https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124333 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:03:44 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124333 How do you take such effective detailed notes during game play while maintaining concentration on the game?
Do you ask you opponent for any permissions, organisers?

Love the website and look daily for new articles, mostly great sometimes not so.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124332 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 01:43:56 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124332 In reply to Frank Herfjord.

Wow, I’ve never thought of it that way before! You sure told me.

]]>
By: Frank Herfjord https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124331 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 23:10:15 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124331 In reply to Anonymous.

Hey mister anonymous, did you notice that these articles are presented free of charge? Maybe you will consider your no loss option of not reading them if you don’t like them.

Sheridan, don’t waste your time replying to criticism that has no constructive input on what should be done differently.

]]>
By: Roland F. Rivera Santiago https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124330 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 21:49:58 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124330 In reply to David Ernenwein.

Yeah, I’m with you on that. Now the question is, mainboard or sideboard? I’ll test both, but overall prevalence makes me lean toward main.

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124329 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 21:16:03 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124329 In reply to Roland F. Rivera Santiago.

So far Harbinger has been the real all-star in that matchup for me but yes for Eldrazi you do need Sea’s Claim to win the match. You can spike a few games by just Merfolk being Merfolk but their mana is fast enough that they can race you more often than not, which is the same problem you have against Elves. I don’t like Claim, but while Eldrazi is the new hotness you need them.

]]>
By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124328 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 20:45:00 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124328 Take it from me, Spreading Seas is actually very strong against Temur Delver. They’re so land-light it’s usually easy to cut them off G or R with a single Seas and laugh as they struggle to find a second source. Also you’re lucky this guy wasn’t on Huntmaster/Pyroclasm!

Agree that Folk is great against Eldrazi. I have a ton of slots in my Stompy SB to diffuse that matchup. Congrats on the split.

]]>
By: Michael https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124327 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 20:34:29 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124327 Great report, as usual, but I want to point out that I dont think you should be using names. I remember you did this on your SCG Denver report, and played a buddy of mine, who wasnt too happy to have his name plastered publicly without his permission.

]]>
By: Roland F. Rivera Santiago https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124326 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 20:21:57 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124326 In reply to David Ernenwein.

Interesting. I’m guessing this is why you didn’t feel that Sea’s Claim was worth reaching for at the moment. Do you think you’d be able to take down Eldrazi if you didn’t draw a Spreading Seas? Because my testing experience is actually pointing me toward more Seas effects, because without it I tended to struggle.

]]>
By: josh Hope https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/02/ill-take-it-scg-regionals-report/#comment-2124325 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 20:13:29 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=7369#comment-2124325 just out of interest how old is quinn? <5,<10<15?

]]>