Comments on: Infographic – The Value of Recent Sets https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/03/infographic-the-value-of-recent-sets/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:33:27 +0000 hourly 1 By: Diego Fumagalli https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/03/infographic-the-value-of-recent-sets/#comment-1649182 Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:33:27 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=71180#comment-1649182 In reply to Siol.

This is super cool!!! My compliments for your goal!!

]]> By: Siol https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/03/infographic-the-value-of-recent-sets/#comment-1649081 Fri, 25 Mar 2016 08:58:29 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=71180#comment-1649081 Hi Diego, your infographics are always amazing. They inspired my thesis work presentation and it has been a success, I have to thank you for it.

Best regards.

]]> By: Diego Fumagalli https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/03/infographic-the-value-of-recent-sets/#comment-1648103 Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:39:24 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=71180#comment-1648103 Thanks Markus!

The whole infographic is created with Adobe Illustrator. Unfortunately websites like Infogr.am or Easel.ly are not the correct solution when you want a really specific result.

If you are interested in deepening the design aspects feel free to contact me!

]]> By: Diego Fumagalli https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/03/infographic-the-value-of-recent-sets/#comment-1646554 Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:23:30 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=71180#comment-1646554 In reply to Brandon.

That’s right!

That’s also one of the reasons I choose to analyze “full set value” and not “box average value”, which would have brought to miscalculated results for BFZ and OGW.

Thanks!

]]> By: Brandon https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/03/infographic-the-value-of-recent-sets/#comment-1646452 Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:37:58 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=71180#comment-1646452 Great graphs! I am assuming you did not take int consideration expeditions in their respective set though, is that correct?

]]>