Comments on: Investigating April 4 Banlist Update Consequences https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/04/investigating-april-4-banlist-update-consequences/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Thu, 07 Apr 2016 19:51:34 +0000 hourly 1 By: Roland F. Rivera Santiago https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/04/investigating-april-4-banlist-update-consequences/#comment-2125208 Thu, 07 Apr 2016 19:51:34 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=8800#comment-2125208 In reply to Darcy Hartwick.

Even if they do (and I doubt it), there will be other jank-smashers in the format (Burn and Jund first and foremost) ready to keep them from ever seeing serious play. And that’s a good thing, within reason: this is primarily meant to be a competitive format, not a casual one. You want there to be some standard of play and the development of a healthy metagame (which necessitates having established decks), while at the same time allowing multiple paths to victory.

]]>
By: Nicolas Dangelo Biancaccio https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/04/investigating-april-4-banlist-update-consequences/#comment-2125207 Thu, 07 Apr 2016 15:02:44 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=8800#comment-2125207 I think that this unbans are just to shut down the argument of “modern is about bannings”, just to help the format’s fame

]]>
By: Seth Jacob Glauer https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/04/investigating-april-4-banlist-update-consequences/#comment-2125206 Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:41:11 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=8800#comment-2125206 skyrocketed like the price of a Comcast XFINITY bundle after its promotion ends….Pure gold

]]>
By: Darcy Hartwick https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/04/investigating-april-4-banlist-update-consequences/#comment-2125205 Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:16:41 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=8800#comment-2125205 In reply to Ricardo Takeda.

Just a matter of time before Mox Opal and Simian Spirit Guide get their seats in the penalty box. With more control tools and these silly cards out of the format, modern would slow down a lot which would mean you no longer have to kill someone on turn four to play the game and people could build their silly Brimaz and Soulfire Grand Master decks and have a fighting chance.

]]>
By: Ricardo Takeda https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/04/investigating-april-4-banlist-update-consequences/#comment-2125204 Thu, 07 Apr 2016 01:17:57 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=8800#comment-2125204 I, for one, believe that wizard’s approach to keep a small banlist to be a good one.
One should focus on the source of the problem instead of their consequences.
Thought knot seer and reality smasher are (probably) fine for modern but not on turn 2 and 3.
Keeping unfair and non interactive things in check should be a priority.

One of the few things that should be kept on a very tight leash is fast mana.
That is, hands down, THE most powerful and game breaking thing you can do on magic.
It is the sole reason the moxen, a “strictly worse basic land” artifact ( when it’s already in the field), is a P9 instead of a bulk rare.
For these reasons I think Mox Opal is long overdue in the format.
Saying that Mox Opal is fine because “there is a lot of artifact hate and everyone uses it” is the same as saying the P9 would be fine in legacy because “everyone runs FoW anyway”

]]>