Comments on: The Colors of Modern – Part Five: Green https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/06/colors-modern-part-five-green/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:41:35 +0000 hourly 1 By: Evan Stoddard https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/06/colors-modern-part-five-green/#comment-2125919 Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:41:35 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=10267#comment-2125919 hey you forgot about a lot of the elves, heritage druid, nettle sentinel, lannowar, etc. they is an entire deck based around them. also missing chameleon colossus from side board cards.
over all really well written though, quite enjoy the series.
also happy you’re streaming again.

]]>
By: Michael Osobsky https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/06/colors-modern-part-five-green/#comment-2125918 Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:15:49 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=10267#comment-2125918 It would be great if you could continue the series also for Artifacts. Even though you already treated Multi-Colour cards as part of the colours, why not also spend an whole articel about them?
Also want to use the opportunity to tell you that Modern Nexus really developped into something providing good information and analyzes – keep on going with that! Would be great if you could also do some more content on magic finance.

]]>
By: Trevor Holmes https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/06/colors-modern-part-five-green/#comment-2125917 Fri, 01 Jul 2016 02:49:03 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=10267#comment-2125917 In reply to Noah Andrew.

Hey guys,

Thanks for the response! I detailed my “classification philosophy” last week with Red and thought about copying it over but decided against it. From last week:

Staples, in my mind, are unquestionably powerful spells that are considered auto-inclusions in certain archetypes (and powerful elsewhere) or enable whole archetypes by themselves. Lightning Bolt needs no explanation, as it is ever-present in the format and many archetypes stretch to red just to play Bolt, but almost everything else can be argued as stronger or worse than another option. The line between staple and strong option here is very blurred.

While Kitchen Finks is more prevalent in the format, if I was forced to classify it I would consider it just a “strong option” and not a “staple” as it’s not clearly the best option out of similar cards that perform relatively similar tasks for the mana. Whereas something like Scapeshift provides the best effect for the mana cost (compared to other four mana “ramp” spells like Oracle of Mul Daya or the like). Obviously not the cleanest comparison, but when comparing the “necessity” of something like Glistener Elf or Scapeshift to Kitchen Finks, that’s where I chose to draw the line.

Hope this helps, and if not, let me know if you still disagree! Thanks for the feedback!

Trevor

]]>
By: Noah Andrew https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/06/colors-modern-part-five-green/#comment-2125916 Fri, 01 Jul 2016 01:28:03 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=10267#comment-2125916 In reply to Marco Peluso.

I agree. Glistener Elf is listed as a staple, and Kitchen Finks isn’t? Finks is the number two creature in modern and G Elf is only played in infect.

]]>
By: Marco Peluso https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/06/colors-modern-part-five-green/#comment-2125915 Thu, 30 Jun 2016 22:51:45 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=10267#comment-2125915 I feel as though, as objective and simplified as this innately is, that some cards on the “strong options” list, like Tasigur and Kitchen Finks, are prevalent across many lists, whereas in the same colors, Scapeshift and, to a lesser degree Inquisition, are only seen in one or two decks.

]]>