Comments on: Testing Stoneforge Mystic in Modern: Part One https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:38:10 +0000 hourly 1 By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126720 Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:38:10 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126720 In reply to William Sabato.

Answers are not a reason to unban cards, as the old saying goes “There are bad answers. There are no bad threats.” Cards like Kommand give decks legs against Stoneforge, but you could easily play answers like Dispel and the threat will still be just as problematic (Brutality just kills Stoneforge like Abrupt Decay). If I’m testing banned cards I need to know if the threat itself is trouble, not whether or not there are answers to it. A sufficiently powerful threat will see play regardless of how easily answered it is.

]]>
By: William Sabato https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126719 Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:16:36 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126719 I must say Im surprised you didnt touch on two cards that I think are very influential to a possible unbanning.
Collective Brutality and Kommand both deal with stoneforge with extreme efficiency. Im honestly hoping Mardu can become a viable deck on the back of a stoneforge unban.

]]>
By: Mikefon https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126718 Thu, 22 Sep 2016 06:54:37 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126718 In reply to Kathal09.

I hope you’re right except for the artifact lands. They’re still banned due to krack-clan ironworks not affinity (they indeed make it worse). Stoneforge, Preordain, Dig through time and Dark Depths all together sound a little worrying, but it would be nice to see them in a modern tournament.

]]>
By: Martin Ferdinand Møller https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126717 Thu, 22 Sep 2016 06:33:40 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126717 In reply to David Ernenwein.

As a reply to your comment mikefon. Sfm will only be played in affinity the first week before people realize that is terrible in the deck since it is slow and the body doesnt matter. If they wanted that effect they would play the one mana sorcery that does the same thing.
Saying that it hurts diversity because of the fact that it will be played in a lot of decks is like saying goyf and snap huts diversity of those colors. While they in fact enable different decks to be competative. I think we will Stoneforge help a lot more new decks than overpowering the one that would benefit from that card already.

]]>
By: Rory Alexander Farrell-Madden McDonough https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126716 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:00:33 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126716 Excited to see the results. Looks like you’ve got some good methodology laid out here!

]]>
By: Noah Bruner https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126715 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:51:09 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126715 In reply to David Ernenwein.

Mikefon, I’m actually not too worried about that. It’d be no different than Jeksai Control, Grixis Delver, and Burn all using Lightning Bolt but using the card in very different planned ways. The only problem would be if it takes the decks as a whole too far past the power level of the decks around it.

]]>
By: Kathal09 https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126714 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:06:29 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126714 In reply to Darcy Hartwick.

My opinion on this topic is:

Things which are realistic to come of the list within a couple of years:

SfM, Preordain, DTT, Dark Depths (no Tier 1 deck + enables a new strategy and is good as a control/value finisher and bad as a combo finisher)

Stuff which is likely but will take time:

BBE, Seething Song, Artifact lands (they actually make Affinity worse XD), DRS

Greetings,
Kathal

]]>
By: Mikefon https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126713 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 06:59:23 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126713 In reply to David Ernenwein.

Jeskai, Abzan, Death and Taxes have already been highlighted as some possible deck that could improve with a Stoneforge unban. I think that Affinity too would benefit for having 8 possible plating (and a creature that can carry it). It could even be sleaved up in Bant Knightfall and some builds of Zoo. Aren’t those a bit too many decks? Wouldn’t it hurt metagame diversity? I think that this is the major issue against Stoneforge unban. Not the power level.

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126712 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 05:31:03 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126712 In reply to Gino Killiko.

Probably not, but it would initially be the most played thanks to Legacy. Given what I think the format would end up doing (coming next week) Jeskai would be my guess.

]]>
By: Gino Killiko https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126711 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 05:02:06 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126711 In reply to David Ernenwein.

If SfM were unbanned, do you think D&T would be the best Stoneforge deck in Modern? If not, what do you think it would be?

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126710 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 04:20:43 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126710 In reply to Noah Bruner.

Literally a continuation of Sheridan’s work. Had I been in charge from the beginning I would have gone with Death and Taxes.

]]>
By: Noah Bruner https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126709 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 01:30:20 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126709 Awesome idea, really! As a huge advocate of having as little of a ban list as possible (while of course promoting a healthy format) and a lover of White who wishes it had a bigger role in Modern, I look forward to seeing the results. Quick question; why did you decide to test SFM in Abzan? Is it because you were continuing Sheridan’s experiment, or is it because you think that’s the natural first home for the card?

]]>
By: Darcy Hartwick https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126708 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:38:35 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126708 In reply to Frank Bruzzese.

I wouldn’t go that far, but I bought my thopter/swords two banlist updates before they came off, and got my AV right before it got unbanned. You have to think about what’s realistically coming off in the near future. Buying hypergenesis and skullclamps right now is probably not a good use of money, even if they get unbanned 5 years from now.

I could imagine stoneforge and bloodbraid coming off in the not too distant future (though probably not the kaladesh update) and I could imagine the artifact lands coming off and mox opal going on. The big difference with stoneforge is its a pretty expensive card to invest in if it stays on the list for another couple years.

]]>
By: William Sabato https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126707 Tue, 20 Sep 2016 21:13:29 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126707 In reply to Frank Bruzzese.

I think some are never getting unbanned. I dont ever think they will ever allow a card like jitte into the format

]]>
By: William Sabato https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126706 Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:58:32 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126706 In reply to David Ernenwein.

Eh im picking up 3 judge promos just to be safe. Im hoping mystic might give mardu the 2 drop it needs to take on jund

]]>
By: Frank Bruzzese https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126705 Tue, 20 Sep 2016 19:13:58 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126705 In reply to Darcy Hartwick.

It is my general recommendation that you should have at least a playset of every card on the Modern Banned List. Every single unban has led to a huge price increase – even if just short term – in the relevant card or cards.

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126704 Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:46:25 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126704 In reply to Darcy Hartwick.

I can’t answer that, partially because I’ve been sitting on mine since Cawblade, partially because it would be a huge spoiler, and partially because WOTC is a loose cannon and you never know with them.

]]>
By: Darcy Hartwick https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126703 Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:38:13 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126703 So without giving away next weeks article – would you say its a good idea to pick up some sfm’s if you’re a modern player or not? 😉

]]>
By: Gino Killiko https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126702 Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:30:56 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126702 Can’t wait to see the results. I’d also be curious to see how SfM would do when slotted in to other decks (such as Jeskai), but obviously that would require another gauntlet. I supposed seeing her impact across so many match-ups even in only one deck should give us a pretty good idea whether or not she’s safe. For the record, my prediction is that she is. We’ll see next week if I’m right!

]]>
By: Mikefon https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/09/testing-stoneforge-mystic-part-one/#comment-2126701 Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:13:15 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11600#comment-2126701 Great work indeed! Can’t wait to see the results.

]]>