Comments on: Metagaming in Modern: The Why and How https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/10/metagaming-why-how/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Thu, 06 Oct 2016 16:43:37 +0000 hourly 1 By: Kyle Wright https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/10/metagaming-why-how/#comment-2126885 Thu, 06 Oct 2016 16:43:37 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11827#comment-2126885 In reply to Noah Bruner.

Honestly you dont even need 1x Fair + 1x Unfair deck. You just need two decks that attack at different axis’s. Having Naya Zoo+Merfolk isnt exactly going to give you a ton of options. WHile having Zoo + Blue Moon gives you many. Same for Blue Moon + Storm ect ect. Meta’s generally shift into favoring 2 of the three ( Aggro, Combo, Control ). How much combo control or aggro combo shifts are seen is the hard part to predict.

]]>
By: Noah Bruner https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/10/metagaming-why-how/#comment-2126884 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 19:05:18 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11827#comment-2126884 In reply to Roland F. Rivera Santiago.

Agreed, that is really insightful. I might even take it one step farther and say that you might choose a secondary deck that can specifically prey on the decks that shut down your primary deck. Try and map out what decks are good against your number one deck, and figure out what decks are good against THOSE decks. If there’s a recurring deck that beats many or all of your main disadvantaged matchups, that might be the deck to buy into as your secondary.

]]>
By: Roland F. Rivera Santiago https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/10/metagaming-why-how/#comment-2126883 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 16:02:03 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=11827#comment-2126883 The tip about having a fair deck and an unfair one if you’re going to switch is a good one. I’ll keep that in mind.

]]>