Comments on: Examining Team Unified: The 2016 World Magic Cup https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/team-unified-2016-world-magic-cup/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Tue, 29 Nov 2016 22:17:03 +0000 hourly 1 By: Samuel Joseph Gardner-Medwin https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/team-unified-2016-world-magic-cup/#comment-2127318 Tue, 29 Nov 2016 22:17:03 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12330#comment-2127318 Thanks for the article Trevor. I really enjoyed the in depth analysis and only really disagreed with you when you said “I could highlight a couple other decks, but I’m running a little long here”…

A question for you at Modern Nexus: how are you going to tackle the WMC issue when you release the Metagame Analysis after next?

]]> By: David Hamlin https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/team-unified-2016-world-magic-cup/#comment-2127317 Sat, 26 Nov 2016 05:44:18 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12330#comment-2127317 LOL had to get the shot at BW Tokens (My pet deck and pretty solid choice currently imho) in there didn’t you?

Good article, definitely agree with the analysis, I think we’ll be seeing less Bant Eldrazi as the player base seems to be a bit on the paranoid side in general and I think that will push people more towards the “don’t play it it’s in the format crosshairs” belief.

]]>