Comments on: In With the New: Observing a Shifting Format https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/12/observing-shifting-format/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Fri, 30 Dec 2016 10:33:35 +0000 hourly 1 By: Tommy Hoff Hansen https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/12/observing-shifting-format/#comment-2127500 Fri, 30 Dec 2016 10:33:35 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12601#comment-2127500 In reply to Tommy Hoff Hansen.

Lking bth at mtgtop8.cm and tcdecks it turns out that there hasnt been a top 8 affinity deck during all of december, which is telling a lot, since other dectypes havent rested at all during this month.

http://www.tcdecks.net/metagame.php?format=Modern&fecha=2016-12

one odd thing though, the frontpage of tc decks modern decks lists affinity as having 11 decks in top, so that feature must be counting november as well.

Affinity n innin fr an entire mont is pretty drastic news…

]]>
By: Tommy Hoff Hansen https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/12/observing-shifting-format/#comment-2127499 Wed, 28 Dec 2016 14:56:07 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12601#comment-2127499 One drastic result is the occurring fall of affinity!
The last two weeks, affinity has been played by as few as 1% of players.
(Probably a result of “sun and moon” entering the meta)

It could be interresting to argue for the unbanning of artisfact lands if this trend continues.

The unravelling of 1 archetype is usually followed by immense chaos…

]]>
By: Benjamin Alan Mohr https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/12/observing-shifting-format/#comment-2127498 Mon, 26 Dec 2016 15:32:50 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12601#comment-2127498 In reply to Jordan Boisvert.

Totally agree. Frank Lepore’s article was a bad joke from top to bottom.

]]>
By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/12/observing-shifting-format/#comment-2127497 Mon, 26 Dec 2016 15:22:18 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12601#comment-2127497 In reply to Matt Spencer.

I don’t know much more about this than you do, but I will say that I miss them too, even as someone on the inside. Will pass the word along!

]]>
By: Matt Spencer https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/12/observing-shifting-format/#comment-2127496 Sat, 24 Dec 2016 21:40:17 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12601#comment-2127496 Speaking of observing the format, are we ever getting metagame updates again? And even if we do, are they going to go back to a regular monthly basis? The lag has been ridiculous because those updates used to be the foundation of this website.

]]>
By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/12/observing-shifting-format/#comment-2127495 Sat, 24 Dec 2016 05:59:13 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12601#comment-2127495 In reply to Zach Stackhouse.

Definitely. I don’t personally believe that Modern will ever “become stale” (meaning newer decks have trouble breaking into the format because Standard’s power level is too weak and the card pool has been exhausted). But I don’t think Wizards would even mind if that DID happen, so long as Modern attendance was high and the format remained so diverse. Modern’s showing no signs of losing on either count, so I wouldn’t be too hopeful for Wizards messing with the format’s stated mission any time soon (including introducing new methods of adding cards to Modern or radically redesigning the ban list).

]]>
By: Zach Stackhouse https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/12/observing-shifting-format/#comment-2127494 Fri, 23 Dec 2016 20:36:34 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12601#comment-2127494 Definitely a good point at the end there. It seems like a lot of people have forgotten that 2016 has seen several completely new decks emerge to viable competitive status between Bant Eldrazi, Dredge and UR Kiln Fiend. And that is just among tier 1 and 2 status decks.

]]>