Comments on: A Revolution: The Bannings and Aether Revolt https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Thu, 12 Jan 2017 19:13:29 +0000 hourly 1 By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127724 Thu, 12 Jan 2017 19:13:29 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127724 In reply to Mikefon.

Interesting. That seems decent if you’re really going for Become Immense, but I’m skeptical of it actually being worth it. Wait and see I suppose.
I’m sure they will. Cards like that are welcome additions to any brewing kit. I just have doubts that they will actually be good.

]]>
By: David Hassell https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127723 Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:35:05 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127723 In reply to Kyle Wright.

I think Sram in GW Tokens may be playable (I believe Sam Pardee played a GW Tokens list on Channelfireball a while back). Lines such as:
T1 BoP
T2 Spectral Procession / Nissa Voice of Zendikar
T3 Sram + Beck//Call or Nissa

Those sort of lines, even if you replace procession with raise the alarm, lead to a decent amount of tokens, or cards in hand, or anthem effects. Its pretty easy to splash U for the Beck half, and allows you to play Beck + Raise the Alarm on 4 mana should you miss the combo. In addition, Windbrisk Heights casts Beck//Call too. My initial goldfishing went pretty smoothly, but as many before me have pointed out – i’m not sure how much it improves your bad match-ups. However, if it turns your 50/50 matches into 60/40 (whilst leaving bad match-ups bad), why wouldn’t you do that?

]]>
By: Kyle Wright https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127722 Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:41:15 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127722 In reply to Aaron Elias Newbom.

Sram is not what tokens wants. Tokens wants good ways to speed up its clock.
Need to deal with Tron, Living End, Ad Naus. If it doesnt do that or is a strict upgrade to an existing card it doesnt want it.

]]>
By: Mikefon https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127721 Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:02:57 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127721 I see some infect lists powering out BI with Thought Scour. Don’t know if it works better or worse than other pump spells. Maybe the best will be a mix of pump and scours. I can see infect still quite scary and as capable as before to win at turn 2 or 3. But it has to gamble a bit more to try to win on turn three or sooner while before it could go all-in without fearing removal so it’s just a virtual slow down.
Expertises can be used to cheating a fuse spells on turn two (land mana dork, land expertise -> beck/call or breaking/entering) and that can be an interesting experiment ground.

]]>
By: Kyle Wright https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127720 Thu, 12 Jan 2017 06:03:27 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127720 Metallic Mimic would need testing but its an Anafenza without the color splash.
Whats even better is the fact that you can now block etched champion in affinity. ( need all the help you can get ).

]]>
By: Aaron Elias Newbom https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127719 Thu, 12 Jan 2017 02:15:57 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127719 In reply to David Ernenwein.

The difference is esper is absolutely full of removal and countermagic.
When you run 4 ancestral vision and maybe 2 yahenni’s expertise it’s quite likely you end up with a visions in your hand (the game goes long and you’re definitely going to see a lot of cards)

In my previous esper control build I only ran a single boardwipes because I found that when. You’re running path, slaughter pact, cut, countermagic and hand control, rarely does the field really flood effectively.

The main reason I had a wipe at all was to hedge against tokens and super wide zoo rush. (Also it was solid vs affinity)

Esper control almost never runs out of cards it’s more an issue of mana efficiency. Yahenni’s with no card cast is worse than supreme verdict. By a lot. Unless you have tasigur in play.

However when you begin casting just about any spell (a lingering souls following the wipe is going to be extremely hard to beat) it solves more problems for esper than a hard wipe does.

It allows you to immediately turn the corner and the prevent some haste effects or follow ups from leaving you open to death.

Last night I used expertise into snapcaster to remove two birds of paradise and flashback thoughtseize to remove their next major play.

Ancestral visions may be the BEST play with it but it’s been treating me extremely well.

]]>
By: Felicia Doan https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127718 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:47:46 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127718 In reply to Zach Stackhouse.

No Im not objective because I’ve tested almost 60 games with some competitive results. I’m not meaning to sound angry, I’m just dissapointed at the, “Well this is a waste of time.” Attitude.

Remember the phrase Let it Go was used. That’s disappointing to hear to someone doing everything possible to test viability. Not that I’m mad even.

Also when you add instant win to the potential, it may be much more playable/ competitive.

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127717 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 21:30:30 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127717 In reply to RJ Sims.

Artifact hate is a way of life in Modern, which keeps Affinity down, meaning that a ban there is unwarranted. You can beat Affinity’s busted draws by normal interactive means, so there’s no reason to act. The only way that Opal gets axed is if Lantern or a combo deck start really gaining metagame share.

If they’d banned Stinkweed too I don’t think there is a Dredge deck anymore. I’m ok with that, but I don’t think Wizards is. I think they just wanted to weaken it enough that it falls out of Tier 1 and players don’t have to run so much graveyard hate, which this should accomplish. If it doesn’t then they may get more aggressive later.

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127716 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 21:22:52 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127716 In reply to Aaron Elias Newbom.

The problem is actually fitting it in and the tokens it creates. I agree that three tokens is good deal, but servos are worse than spirits. I don’t think that they’re the kind of token you really want, so for the main effect I don’t think that you’d play Sram’s Expertise. As for the second effect, I’ve never had problems when I played BW Tokens playing lots of spells or just flooding the board with tokens. The problem was actually turning them into wins and I don’t think Sram solves that. People will be trying it out, so I may be wrong. We’ll see.

I agree that Yahenni’s makes sense in Esper, the problem is that I don’t know if you want it to. Again, the number of decks where -3/-3 is better than Destroy All Creatures is fairly small. Drawing three cards as well is good when you pull it off, but what about all the other cases? Yes, you can sweep small creatures and then kill a large one for four mana, but Damnation would have done that too. If you’re using it to place a threat or Liliana of the Veil, wouldn’t you want it in play before you sweep in a lot of cases? I’m just not convinced that the effect is enough to be worth the cost long term.

]]>
By: Zach Stackhouse https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127715 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:57:02 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127715 In reply to Felicia Doan.

If you want objectivity, do the testing and prove people wrong. Don’t get mad when someone has an opinion you dislike unless you plan to bring evidence to the table proving otherwise. Your pro-cat post wasn’t exactly objective either. And if blinking VC, snap and pia/kiran was so good, a deck like that may have already existed with existing blinkers like eldrazi displacer and flickerwisp. Yet…they don’t except for fringe jeskai midrange decks.

]]>
By: Aaron Elias Newbom https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127714 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:36:41 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127714 Srams expertise in BW tokens seems very very strong.

Yahenni’s expertise coupled with fatal push enables some esper and UB strategies very heavily, especially alongside ancestral visions.

I do believe there is enough reason to justify esper over jeskai control now.

]]>
By: Chris Striker https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127713 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:16:35 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127713 In reply to Chris Striker.

*this

]]>
By: Chris Striker https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127712 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:16:16 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127712 I’m glad to see Thia coverage on aether revolts many new modern toys. I also think renegade rallier is a real undiscussed sleeper here, and I would be very happy to see Abzan climb back up the rankings, putting mire bgx police decks in tier 1.

]]>
By: Felicia Doan https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127711 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:48:50 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127711 So, that’s it. No testing, no assumed potential? Copycat ( felidar rai) is an aggressively costed, two card combo. Forget comparing to twin. A little objectivity would be more sensible. You say the cards are unplayable as if Splinter Twin the card was literally instant speed and was playable without combo. No seriously, you make valid points. I just feel your being a little too dismissive. Consider the etb synergies with vendilion clique, snap and pia kiran nalar. Not that these are broken but most definitely not useless alongside an instant win.

]]>
By: RJ Sims https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127710 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:39:04 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127710 I’m sad to see Gitaxian Probe go mostly because I played it in fringe combo brews for it’s “56 card deck effect” but mostly because it hurt poor storm players who keep getting the shaft. I’m surprised anyone still plays that deck and when I see someone that is a die hard and still does I shake their hand. But if they are going to ban Gitax for its speed and consistency then why didn’t Mox get the axe? I can’t think of any other deck that is hellbent turn one.

Anyways as for the GGT ban: Was he enough? They said they were going after the dredge mechanic itself. I guess the better question is: What did WOTC set out to do when addressing Dredge? Was it to obliterate it completely? Make it tier 1.5? What? Just where they say they were targeting the mechanic itself I think if they really wanted to make dredge hurt Stinky should have gone too as well.

]]>
By: Roland F. Rivera Santiago https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127709 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:02:47 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127709 Agreed on pretty much everything you said. The only card I’m less bullish on than you is Vengeful Rebel, since a big part of E&T’s shtick is basically removing the “give your opponent their card back” clause from Tidehollow Sculler and Flickerwisp, which mostly means that Vengeful Rebel is only better than Strangler if there’s a Displacer on the board, which feels a bit corner-case. The fact that it can’t be slammed out faster with Eldrazi Temple and can be protected against (because it doesn’t have devoid) make me think it’s not quite good enough.

A card I am bullish on, however, is Renegade Rallier. That card is going to be spectacular in GW Death & Taxes.

]]>
By: Wallace Freemon https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/01/revolution-bannings-aether-revolt/#comment-2127708 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 17:41:01 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12793#comment-2127708 Losing Probe makes your mulligan decisions easier, not harder. Probe represents a random card in your opening hand.

As for speed and consistency… well, you’re going from a 56 card deck to a 60 card deck, so each piece is less common. You’ll have a slightly lower concentration of infecters, but a higher concentration of pump spells (based on proposed changes from players like Tom Ross). Assuming you have your infect dude, you’re probably goldfishing slightly faster.

So basically, the deck is a bit better against lightly interactive decks, and a bit worse against the interactive decks. Part of this argument is also that Become Immense is better against something like BGx than against Tron.

]]>