Comments on: Insider: An Objective Look at Modern Masters https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/02/insider-an-objective-look-at-modern-masters/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Tue, 18 Jan 2022 02:05:19 +0000 hourly 1 By: q ed2 https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/02/insider-an-objective-look-at-modern-masters/#comment-1846536 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:50:07 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=79418#comment-1846536 1)

wary, not weary

2)

your editor should have told you to take the GD tables out. that’s like a hundred lines to say what could have been said in one (“there were four mythic repeats: bob goyf clique kiki”). and again with the nonmythics.

great idea, poor execution 7/10 would read again

]]> By: David Schumann https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/02/insider-an-objective-look-at-modern-masters/#comment-1846462 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:16:53 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=79418#comment-1846462 In reply to KaiAn Tsai.

Thanks. I am a firm believer that if you are going to invest your money in anything you should have solid reasoning behind it. I also have to admit that I honestly didn’t realize how little crossover the first two MMs had until I started the article, nor did I realize how much “chafe” was in the sets at rare.

]]> By: Michael Canzanella https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/02/insider-an-objective-look-at-modern-masters/#comment-1846294 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 05:06:20 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=79418#comment-1846294 Well done.

]]> By: KaiAn Tsai https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/02/insider-an-objective-look-at-modern-masters/#comment-1846220 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:37:35 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=79418#comment-1846220 I just had to say that this article is what I as a speculator was looking for. Eventhough it was was a speculative article, the reasoning that was backed by Facts was amazing. I hope that QS writers will produce more of this type of data/trend analysis type of articles.

]]>