Comments on: Ancestral Vision: A Case Study https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/03/ancestral-vision-case-study/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Mon, 13 Mar 2017 23:11:34 +0000 hourly 1 By: Matt Owens https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/03/ancestral-vision-case-study/#comment-2128067 Mon, 13 Mar 2017 23:11:34 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=13644#comment-2128067 In reply to Roland F. Rivera Santiago.

I believe the reason for the wishy-washiness is bc the answer is fluid. Mtgo meta, fmn, States, Gran Prix….overall, I’m sure it’s a fine inclusion since we can all agree that modern has slowed down. For how long though…? Then the evaluation on AV changes again; From good/solid to unplayable.

]]> By: Roland F. Rivera Santiago https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/03/ancestral-vision-case-study/#comment-2128066 Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:03:54 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=13644#comment-2128066 I feel like this conclusion was kind of wishy-washy, to be honest. You didn’t commit firmly to whether you thought it was worth playing in the current metagame or not. I’m of the opinion that it is, and that it’s one of the big reasons Grixis Control does well in fair deck mirrors – most fair decks can’t kill you through disruption before it goes off, and they usually can’t deal with the card advantage that you get out of it. It’s a little shakier against streamlined aggressive strategies, but it usually slams the door shut hard once you do resolve it.

]]> By: William Sabato https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/03/ancestral-vision-case-study/#comment-2128065 Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:15:00 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=13644#comment-2128065 I love Modern Nexus, but honestly was this much in depth analysis pf AV really nescessary to say conclusively that it belongs in control decks?

]]>