Comments on: Say Hello to My Furry Friend: Revisiting Temur Delver https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/03/revisiting-temur-delver/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:55:13 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/03/revisiting-temur-delver/#comment-2128177 Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:55:13 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=13902#comment-2128177 In reply to SOU Organization.

A midrange deck with a cheap threat with which to cheese wins against Tron, AN, Burn, and other linear strategies. Grixis Delver is inconsistent when it comes to sticking an early threat in the early turns in that kind of matchup, making it a worse Temur Delver there and a worse Grixis Control against fair decks. But it’s obviously better at adopting the midrange role than we are, since it’s built like a midrange deck. Overall: competent but unfocused, and not superb at any one thing.

]]>
By: SOU Organization https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/03/revisiting-temur-delver/#comment-2128176 Mon, 03 Apr 2017 16:20:54 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=13902#comment-2128176 what’s your opinion​ of grixis​ delver?

]]>
By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/03/revisiting-temur-delver/#comment-2128175 Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:57:54 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=13902#comment-2128175 In reply to Kevork Agh.

I really don’t. We need as many ways as possible to protect the threat we suit up with Curiosity, and it helps that Curi pitches to Shoal itself when we need it to. In Bolt matchups, it’s generally best to save Curi for Mandrills or Goyf; in linear matchups like Tron, though, dropping it on our first threat is fine.

]]>
By: Kevork Agh https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/03/revisiting-temur-delver/#comment-2128174 Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:18:00 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=13902#comment-2128174 Do you think Curiosity works in a shoalless build? Odd question, but it seems committing 2 mana to a delver that eats bolt seems bad without some sort of backup.

]]>