Comments on: Insider: Pauper is Basically Legacy https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/05/insider-pauper-is-basically-legacy/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Tue, 18 Jan 2022 02:03:02 +0000 hourly 1 By: Douglas Johnson https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/05/insider-pauper-is-basically-legacy/#comment-1870699 Thu, 11 May 2017 16:36:12 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=80812#comment-1870699 In reply to David Schumann.

Yeah, I should have elaborated on those niches that make certain legalities possible. It was printed in Vintage Masters as a common, and the paper format list is based off the MTGO format. Certain cards are legal on MTGO, therefore legal in Paper even though they’re uncommon. These are especially great picks, because they haven’t been reprinted to death yet. Tangle from Invasion is another great example of this.

]]> By: Blake Miller https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/05/insider-pauper-is-basically-legacy/#comment-1870697 Thu, 11 May 2017 16:31:13 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=80812#comment-1870697 In reply to David Schumann.

If it’s appeared in a set on MTGO as a common, that makes it pauper legal too. I believe it was like Vintage Masters or something.

]]> By: David Schumann https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/05/insider-pauper-is-basically-legacy/#comment-1870687 Thu, 11 May 2017 15:22:37 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=80812#comment-1870687 Battle Screech has only the one printing from judgement at uncommon…so how is it in paper Pauper?

]]>