This article: Why is everyone hating so irrationally hard on DS Grixis?!?

I think you should reread your last month+ of articles on this subject, ideally with someone else helping to identify where your own biases and ego are hampering your analysis and your writing.

You predicted that the best deck in the format would do well, then it did and you bragged about it in your next article (akin to me bragging about predicting that the Warriors would win the title). This led you to overstate just how good the deck actually was, calling it dominant and writing off evidence to the contrary (didn’t show up in the Classic because it’s pilots were all in day 2? Seriously?). Your bias also led you to misinterpret your own tournament performance, in a way that came off as extremely arrogant. Now your pet deck, which happens to be the best deck in the format, gets targeted by some hate (predictably) and we get some pseudo-psychology about how the hate is irrationally driven by the deck being less fun to lose too (something many people would NOT agree with).

I think you could write some useful content if you were able to drop some of the ego/bias driven stuff and focus more on actually helping the reader than validating your opinions. Instead of just making predictions why not give more concrete advice related to those predictions? “Decks X, Y, Z are poised to surge next week so you should be looking to do…”.

Of course to a degree this kind of analysis is limited in its usefulness in Modern due to the sheer diversity in the format. Dredge upticking from 5% of the meta to 8% is a big jump…but not actually going to have that big of an impact on how often I face the deck in a given league/tourney. With that in mind I think an extremely useful analytical take along the lines you are good at would involve grouping/sorting multiple decks by angles of attack or cards that they are soft to. Maybe Dredge going up a few % isn’t a big deal, but it it is rising along with 2 other decks that are weak to Gradiggers Cage now we have some actionable intelligence. Along the same lines you could keep track of the meta shares of decks that are softer to Path/Push/Bolt/Decay/etc, helping people to know which types of removal will likely be optimal that week. Are decks that are soft to sweepers on the uptick? Anyway, just a suggestion for how you could convert your predictions (something I think you are good at) into more useful information for the reader.