Comments on: Video Series with Ryland: Mono-Blue Living End https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/12/video-series-with-ryland-mono-blue-living-end/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:18:54 +0000 hourly 1 By: Ryland Taliaferro https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/12/video-series-with-ryland-mono-blue-living-end/#comment-2129014 Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:18:54 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=16806#comment-2129014 In reply to ben coley.

Glad you enjoyed it. Thanks for watching!

]]> By: Ryland Taliaferro https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/12/video-series-with-ryland-mono-blue-living-end/#comment-2129013 Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:18:37 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=16806#comment-2129013 In reply to Carlos Fidel Dallmeier.

The problem with pact in this deck is that while it is tutorable, we don’t kill our opponent on the “combo” turn. Obviously we’re in the right color to be able to pay for the pact, but that doesn’t mean that we can always really afford to. There are a lot of games where having five mana would be prohibitive. Perhaps it the board so we can bring it in the correct matchups? (The slower grinder ones). Either way, something worth thinking about.

Thanks for watching!

]]> By: Carlos Fidel Dallmeier https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/12/video-series-with-ryland-mono-blue-living-end/#comment-2129012 Fri, 15 Dec 2017 05:36:58 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=16806#comment-2129012 I think maybe you could shave the chalices and maybe add one pact of negation and one slaughter pact to the main and a couple of gigadrowze to guarantee the following turn. Great testing though.

]]> By: ben coley https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/12/video-series-with-ryland-mono-blue-living-end/#comment-2129011 Thu, 14 Dec 2017 08:39:08 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=16806#comment-2129011 Thanks for showcasing this deck :). Certainly I appreciate your efforts to improve and refine a new and fairly rough deck.

]]>