Comments on: Bloodbraid Month, Pt. 3: Qualitative Data https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/01/bloodbraid-month-pt-3-qualitative-data/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:10:12 +0000 hourly 1 By: Gert Corthout https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/01/bloodbraid-month-pt-3-qualitative-data/#comment-2129084 Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:10:12 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=17086#comment-2129084 I also had a lot of salty opponents when playing shardless in legacy. But the thing is, after sideboarding you usually only have blowouts left to cascade in, that’s kind of the Point of the deck.

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/01/bloodbraid-month-pt-3-qualitative-data/#comment-2129083 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 21:25:28 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=17086#comment-2129083 In reply to ben coley.

As I said, the experience of playing Bloodbraid Elf in Modern is exactly what you remember. If you enjoyed it back when, you’ll like it now. If like me you didn’t, you still won’t. Nothing has qualitatively changed.

]]>
By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/01/bloodbraid-month-pt-3-qualitative-data/#comment-2129082 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 21:23:45 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=17086#comment-2129082 In reply to ben coley.

I agree with you Ben, and would personally welcome Elf back into Modern with open arms at this point. Here’s a card that handsomely rewards careful deckbuilding, and far from slots into any deck in its colors. I think Elf would push Jund a bit but not past even the delirium Shadow decks, let alone Grixis. There may even remain ways to build BGx without Elf (such as with Souls and Rhino).

]]>
By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/01/bloodbraid-month-pt-3-qualitative-data/#comment-2129081 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 21:22:00 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=17086#comment-2129081 In reply to kameenook.

Oopsie! We’ll have this fixed by the end of the day. Sorry for the wait.

]]>
By: ben coley https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/01/bloodbraid-month-pt-3-qualitative-data/#comment-2129080 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 21:19:48 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=17086#comment-2129080 Interesting for sure:

I played during those times and my experience was different. I played against and with the elf and remember it fondly. Distinctly, what I remember from the time is a sense that bloodbraid elf was the synergistic centrepiece of a bunch of carefully crafted decks. In a very comparative way it’s like the RG snapcaster mage. It wasn’t overpowered like the Titans, or even baneslayer angel (cards from back around a similar time), it was merely an efficient cog in a machine.

And that’s why I feel (for modern at least) it’s totally fine. Modern is a haven for ‘cog’ type cards, especially when they don’t play into or cater towards an insular, aggressive mechanic like storm or infect. Bloodbraid is just generic ‘value’ at the pretty high cost of four mana. In the right deck and in the right situation it’s a powerful way to turn a corner and 2-for-1 the opponent, and that’s completely fine.

I could be wrong I suppose. I look at the environment and card pool of modern and just don’t see any issue with the elf and what it does, from the perspective of ban-worthiness.

]]>
By: kameenook https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/01/bloodbraid-month-pt-3-qualitative-data/#comment-2129079 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 20:43:00 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=17086#comment-2129079 Is there any reason that only the tron and affinity decks have lands in them out of the gauntlet ?

]]>