Comments on: Insider: Preparing for an Energy Ban https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/01/insider-preparing-for-an-energy-ban/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Tue, 18 Jan 2022 01:49:19 +0000 hourly 1 By: Kyle Rusciano https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/01/insider-preparing-for-an-energy-ban/#comment-1939764 Tue, 09 Jan 2018 16:06:43 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=85371#comment-1939764 In reply to Justin Smith.

Hey Justin, thanks for the question. To some extent, of course. But Energy has reached Caw Blade levels of metagame percentage, something that Merfolk will not be able to match. There would be an influx of Botanical Sanctum into the marketplace, and demand would not be able to sustain a $8-$10 price. Already Sanctum is dropping in value as players and speculators anticipate the ban – I sold my 6 copies several days ago, and it appears others are doing the same.

There’s also downward pressure on Sanctum (and all the KLD fastlands) due to the treasure chests. Sanctum sits at a 12 frequency now. Over time that is going to put a hard ceiling on its price.

]]> By: Justin Smith https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/01/insider-preparing-for-an-energy-ban/#comment-1939762 Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:41:18 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=85371#comment-1939762 Wouldn’t the potental drop in price on Botanical Sanctum due to an Energy ban be negated by the fact that it would probably make U/G Merfolk better?

]]>