Comments on: The Cycle’s Sick: Introducing Six Shadow https://www.quietspeculation.com/2019/11/cycles-sick-introducing-six-shadow/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Sat, 23 Nov 2019 06:45:51 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jordan Boisvert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2019/11/cycles-sick-introducing-six-shadow/#comment-2130185 Sat, 23 Nov 2019 06:45:51 +0000 https://quietspeculation.com/?p=21026#comment-2130185 In reply to Steven Givens.

The Snaps are far from necessary in this deck. I built it to cater to my preferences, so my advice is to replace them with anything you like—Jace or otherwise! If you are totally indifferent, maxing on Sleight and Inquisition can’t hurt.

]]> By: Steven Givens https://www.quietspeculation.com/2019/11/cycles-sick-introducing-six-shadow/#comment-2130184 Sat, 23 Nov 2019 05:43:53 +0000 https://quietspeculation.com/?p=21026#comment-2130184 So question, I own basically this entire list minus the 2 snapcasters. Any suggestions on what to replace them with? Maybe baby jaces? You lose the ability to have snap/stubborn lines, but this deck also seems like it wouldn’t mind the looting, as well as having yet another threat that can win the game on its own.

]]>