Comments on: Errant Errata: June B&R Reaction https://www.quietspeculation.com/2020/06/errant-errata-june-br-reaction/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Wed, 03 Jun 2020 19:49:51 +0000 hourly 1 By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2020/06/errant-errata-june-br-reaction/#comment-2130256 Wed, 03 Jun 2020 19:49:51 +0000 https://quietspeculation.com/?p=21770#comment-2130256 In reply to Steven Givens.

Funnily enough, first deck I faced on MTGO after the rules change was doing exactly that. It didn’t work too well, but I’m chalking that up to that specific deck being unrefined. There’s a lot of potential there, though I can’t say that it will actually be good.

]]>
By: Steven Givens https://www.quietspeculation.com/2020/06/errant-errata-june-br-reaction/#comment-2130255 Wed, 03 Jun 2020 19:17:18 +0000 https://quietspeculation.com/?p=21770#comment-2130255 I wonder if we’re going to see the rise of maindeck Lurrus now. Before, it was always worth it to make your whole deck meet the requirement so you got the extra card in hand, but now? I could definitely see Jund going back to running LotV and BBE, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see people trying out Lurrus as a one or two of in the maindeck of some mid-range decks, as even without warping your deck around it anymore, a 3/2 with lifelink for 3 that can re-buy goyfs, oozes, bobs, wrenns, etc. still seems like a totally reasonable card to play.

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2020/06/errant-errata-june-br-reaction/#comment-2130254 Wed, 03 Jun 2020 00:30:56 +0000 https://quietspeculation.com/?p=21770#comment-2130254 In reply to Dan W..

Actually, I’ve been playing around with Lurrus in Merfolk. As anti-Jund tech, it’s very good since Vial helps dodge discard, the game goes long and you tend to flood. Kinda mediocre elsewhere, but there’s a lot of potential.

In my testing, maindeck Lurrus is pretty poor in Taxes decks, and not great as a companion. If you go really deep on flicker effects there’s value in spades, but I didn’t find the effort worthwhile.

I wouldn’t count the companions as a whole out just yet. Yorion in particular will remain a part of the meta. I’m not sure about how though. Some decks were on artifacts and Urza, some snow and value not sure how it will all shake out.

I’m not sure how the meta goes. I don’t think it reverts, but it also can’t remain as-is. Prowess is taking a big hit here, and I’ve always thought Amulet was overrated. This was especially true online when Ponza was everywhere, and given that it stands to take the weakest hit, may be The Deck.

]]>
By: Dan W. https://www.quietspeculation.com/2020/06/errant-errata-june-br-reaction/#comment-2130253 Tue, 02 Jun 2020 22:53:11 +0000 https://quietspeculation.com/?p=21770#comment-2130253 Well I have to say that this solution is probably the most outside-of-the-box way to approach the problem of companions. While I thought the Jim Davis solution was what we’d see, it still presented a problem with mulligans that this solution avoids. While I think this change renders companions moot for the most part, your assessment seems pretty solid.

I wonder if there are some corner cases where using something like Aether Vial will mitigate some of downsides of paying the companion tax. I don’t see this being the case in decks like Humans or Merfolk, but maybe something like a G/W D&T build that runs Vial along side Noble H to help with the tax. But I still don’t see if it’s be worth it, at that stage players are probably just better off running Lurrus as a main deck card. He’s certainly strong enough to justify it.

So, let’s discuss the future: If companions are functionally toast, do we just go back to a format that is dominated by mono-R Prowess, Amulet Titan, and Snow decks? I’d imagine so–at least until M2021 gives Merfolk a bomb 1 drop that rockets the archetype to tier 0 status. A fish player can dream right?

]]>