Comments on: Omnath Impresses: A Study in Variations https://www.quietspeculation.com/2020/10/omnath-impresses-study-in-variations/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:44:30 +0000 hourly 1 By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2020/10/omnath-impresses-study-in-variations/#comment-2130310 Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:44:30 +0000 https://quietspeculation.com/?p=22270#comment-2130310 In reply to Dan W..

Gotta take a stand.

Plus…that sort of discussion is an article idea. And those are scarce this year.

]]>
By: Dan W. https://www.quietspeculation.com/2020/10/omnath-impresses-study-in-variations/#comment-2130309 Mon, 26 Oct 2020 04:35:02 +0000 https://quietspeculation.com/?p=22270#comment-2130309 In reply to David Ernenwein.

Damn it David, alway with the level-headed, data driven, sensibilities! Don’t you know this is 2020!? Up is down, black is white! Cats and dogs are living together! It’s mass hysteria!

]]>
By: David Ernenwein https://www.quietspeculation.com/2020/10/omnath-impresses-study-in-variations/#comment-2130308 Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:03:47 +0000 https://quietspeculation.com/?p=22270#comment-2130308 In reply to Dan W..

As the October data is coming in, I’m seeing some contradictory trends. Omanth and Uro are taking up a large part of the meta, as is Rakdos Shadow. However, they’re not doing too much better than the rest of the meta, especially with DnT coming on strong. Particularly, Uro’s average points are fairly average and Rakdos is below average. I’m not seeing anything too problematic in the data.

Thus is Wizards chooses to do anything to Modern, it would have to be on the basis of things being unfun. Which is so subjective that action is pretty unlikely. We’d need to see saturation and complaining similar to Astrolabe for anything to happen. I think it’s as good as realistically possible at the moment.

Now, I’d like to see certain cards gone, but I’m not sure that would actually improve anything. The metagame looks too balanced to justify shaking the tree, and it’d be easier to unleash something bad than positive. And I also can’t justify it as anything other than I don’t like them. And that’s not a good enough reason.

]]>
By: Dan W. https://www.quietspeculation.com/2020/10/omnath-impresses-study-in-variations/#comment-2130307 Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:54:01 +0000 https://quietspeculation.com/?p=22270#comment-2130307 Great read, David, thanks!

It seems that the consensus is that modern is in decent shape. Diversity seems to ne the order of things. And new decks are taking the stage along with established juggernauts like Titan and Prowess. While I’d argue thst diversity alone doesn’t make a format “healthy”. I have to admit even for us Fish players, things seem to be pretty fine. Not amazing, but fine.

Standard seems to have been the focus (justifiability so) of Wizards’ efforts. But, i wonder, now that standard seems to more lor less in a decent place, do you think there’s anything that can be done to hone a good modern format into a great one? What problems do you see in the format? What jalopies could use a boost? What hot rods need to have a governor installed?

]]>