Comments on: Insider: Inventory Management https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/08/insider-inventory-management/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Tue, 18 Jan 2022 02:00:01 +0000 hourly 1 By: pi https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/08/insider-inventory-management/#comment-1900101 Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:57:08 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=82311#comment-1900101 In reply to David Schumann.

I have DB access to the back-end, which I’ve been using for some of my articles. I can use it to gather a lot of data quite quickly, though making some nice graphs and summaries out of it takes time (though likely much less than doing it manually).

I was thinking of trying to make a selection of the last 6 months before rotation and next 6 months on a per set basis and then averaging the prices (or maybe averaging the price changes?) for every card that starts higher than a given value at best buylist (I’m thinking $1, but maybe that selects too many). The big advantage of having the query is being able to run it again at any time (and because I query from a spreadsheet program I can also couple that to the graphs, so those can then also be generated automatically).

This wouldn’t be a particularly easy query to write, but I think it’s doable with some research on rotation dates.

]]>
By: David Schumann https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/08/insider-inventory-management/#comment-1899725 Wed, 16 Aug 2017 21:18:16 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=82311#comment-1899725 In reply to pi.

Please do. Having access to more data would open up a lot of possible analysis. Gathering the data that I did was somewhat tedious and time consuming…automating it would be amazing.

]]>
By: pi https://www.quietspeculation.com/2017/08/insider-inventory-management/#comment-1899723 Wed, 16 Aug 2017 20:13:27 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=82311#comment-1899723 This has got me thinking about how I might write a query that would gather data like this per set in the period before its rotation. Would you mind if at some point I build on this?

]]>