Are you a Quiet Speculation member?
If not, now is a perfect time to join up! Our powerful tools, breaking-news analysis, and exclusive Discord channel will make sure you stay up to date and ahead of the curve.
Welcome to the MTGO Market Report as compiled by Sylvain Lehoux and Matthew Lewis. The report is loosely broken down into two perspectives. A broader perspective will be written by Matthew and will focus on recent trends in set prices, taking into account how paper prices and MTGO prices interact. Sylvain will take a closer look at particular opportunities based on various factors such as (but not limited to) set releases, flashback drafts and banned/restricted announcements.
There will be some overlap between the two sections. As always, speculators should take into account their own budget, risk tolerance and current portfolio before taking on any recommended positions.
Redemption
Below are the total set prices for all redeemable sets on MTGO. All prices are current as of September 28th, 2015. The TCG Low and TCG Mid prices are the sum of each set’s individual card prices on TCG Player, either the low price or the mid-price respectively.
All MTGO set prices this week are taken from Goatbot’s website, and all weekly changes are now calculated relative to Goatbot’s ‘Full Set’ prices from the previous week. All monthly changes are also relative to the previous month prices, taken from Goatbot’s website at that time. Occasionally ‘Full Set’ prices are not available, and so estimated set prices are used instead.
Targeted Recommendations Summary
In today’s report we take a look back at the last six months of the MTGO Market Report to perform an analysis of the buy and sell recommendations.
Each closed call (i.e. the card was bought and sold) can be evaluated and judged a success or failure by looking at percentage gains or losses. We’ll also construct a mock portfolio to estimate what the net gains or losses could be for a speculator following the recommendations. Lastly, we’ll make comments on any outstanding buy calls and discuss their future.
Evaluation Method
There is no absolute and exhaustive method to evaluate the performance of our recommendations, but we’ve come up with what we think is an objective approach to estimate gains and losses. Gains and losses presented here may be different from a given person’s portfolio, even if they strictly followed our recommendations.
Buy Prices
For every recommendation, the buy price we used is the price as recorded by Mtggoldfish.com on the day of the recommendation. The bias here is that it’s possible to buy cards at a lower price than the listed Mtggoldfish price. Mtggoldfish uses Mtgotraders prices which are frequently not the cheapest (they focus on stocking every card, not the lowest price). Also, acting on the recommendation on a different day might yield different results if prices fluctuated in the interim period.
Sell Prices
The sell price we used is the price as recorded by Mtggoldfish.com on the day of recommendation, with the following adjustments. For every card price below 2 Tix, 80% of the recorded sell price was assumed to be retained. This accounts for the buy and sell spread of most bots on low-priced cards, which tend to have higher margins.
The only exception made to this rule was for our booster positions. As the spread for boosters is extremely low, we considered 90% of the recorded selling price even when boosters sold for less than 2 Tix. For cards above 2 tix, 90% of the recorded sell price was assumed to be retained.
Again, the exact price which a given speculator gets will probably not correspond perfectly to the sell price either. The purpose is to illustrate what is possible, given a reasonable set of assumptions and the actual buy and sell recommendations given in the report.
Prices used for recommendations still open are current as of Sunday, the 27th of September. The same 80% and 90% price adjustments have been taken into consideration for cards less than 2 tix and cards greater than 2 tix, respectively.
The Mock Portfolio
A mock portfolio based on these recommendations was built in order to put the recommendations into a different, more tangible context. The rules of this simulated portfolio are as follows. A maximum of 50 Tix was dedicated to each recommendation, and an upper limit on the number of copies was set to 40. Based on our experience, buying or selling up to 40 copies of a given card without significantly affecting prices is possible if a number of different bot chains are used.
Similarly to our summary at the end of June we also took into account the fact that Tix generated by selling positions can be re-invested into new positions. Basically, we added the dimension of compound interest to our mock portfolio.
Evaluating the Recommendations
The table below presents the percentage change in each recommendation as per the above assumptions.
* Indicates the maximum buying price we recommended for this card, although the price on Mtggoldfish was higher on the day we recommended the position.
Considering all recommendations, both closed and open, the average gain is +30.2%. If only closed positions are considered, the average gain is +49.9%. These percentages are barely lower than those reviewed at the end of June (+34.6% and +50.4%, respectively).
Currently, a lot of our open positions are down. The average percentage gain of our open positions is +5.3%. However this is a flattering and somewhat biased way to look at our current open positions, since this number doesn't account for the value of each position--cheap positions that don't reach the 50 Tix limit and expensive positions that are maxed out to 50 Tix are weighed the same.
This is a biased perspective since cheap positions, such as Herald of the Pantheon and Eye of Ugin, can have a high percentage variation with fluctuations of just a few cents, whereas their effective gain in Tix is low.
A more accurate and objective way to look at our open positions is using the table below:
The mock portfolio shows you how much of each position it would have. After nine months now, this mock portfolio would have bought and sold 114 positions, while 90 still remain open.
The total buying value of the 90 open positions was 3555.5 Tix. The current value of these same 90 positions is now of 3278.4 Tix, a loss of 8.8% seen from this angle.
The positions currently held in our mock portfolio are mainly divided into Modern and Standard positions. On the one hand, after having just sold the most profitable among our Modern positions, we are by default left with the losing ones or those we expect to grow further in the future. On the other hand, the Standard positions we have recommended, and particularly the ORI ones, aimed to perform best later this fall in the new Standard environment after rotation takes place on MTGO.
It is therefore unsurprising that so few of them are profitable at the moment. In addition, the effect of the BFZ release is being felt as prices have started to decline in both Modern and Standard.
With the profit of 114 closed positions that would have been re-invested (as any speculator would proceed with his/her own portfolio) it would not make sense to compare the total buying price of all the positions to the total selling price to estimate the overall profit generated.
Instead, and in order to more accurately reflect the accumulated value of a real portfolio, we built a cumulative table to account for the Tix balance of the mock portfolio at any time during these first six months. Every time a card is bought, an amount of Tix (corresponding to the number of copies times buying price) is debited; every time a card is sold, an amount of Tix (corresponding to the number of copies times selling price) is credited.
Here is the cumulative table (click to expand):
A starting mock portfolio of 2500 Tix was used to cover all of the MTGO Market Report buying recommendations, according to the above buying assumptions.
With this, the mock portfolio would currently be valued at 4151.0 Tix. The current open positions account for a total value of 3278.4 Tix and the mock portfolio would also have 872.6 free Tix (2500 - 1627.4). 4151 Tix represents a 66% increase in bankroll value since January.
Our mock portfolio hardly moved compared to three months ago. At the end of June our mock porftolio was already up by 65.1% compared to January.
Outlook for Currently Open Recommendations
Standard Positions
Cards from Khans of Tarkir and Fate Reforged have the unusual privilege of being the first sets to rotate under the new system. This means they will rotate out of Standard with the release of Tears, the as-of-yet unknown large set expansion due in April 2016. With that in mind, the potential sales window for any spec from these two sets will be small. February is a rough cutoff date.
Monastery Mentor has been holding value and sees play in both Legacy and Vintage. The announced change to Legacy and Vintage Daily Events is a positive step towards encouraging more play of these formats. On top of that, the format of the November MOCS is Legacy Constructed, which will be a short-term driver of prices for Legacy-playable cards. If Monastery Mentor doesn't show any significant uptake in Fall Standard, look to November for a good sales window.
Cards from Magic Origins are all solid holds heading into a rotating Standard format. Any cards that get a significant boost in playability in Fall Standard should quickly reflect it in their price, and speculators should look to sell in response to any demand-driven price spikes. Otherwise, cards from ORI will see steady gains into the winter, following the typical cycle of set prices through the year. Speculators should be looking to sell down any remaining ORI positions from December to March.
Junk mythic rares from THS are attracting buying activity in recent weeks. Medomai the Ageless has bumped up to a higher level and will receive further buying interest after the BFZ release events die down. This one will be a long-term hold as long as an online set of THS is priced at a discount to the paper version.
Modern
The progression of Modern prices has clearly come to a halt at this time of the year, when Standard is about to rotate and a new Fall set will be released in few days. Several weeks ago we decided to sell most of our profitable positions which, by default, left us with losing positions or ones that haven’t increased enough according to our expectations.
Our current Modern positions break down into two categories: Modern Masters 2015 positions and the rest. Several of the “other” Modern positions, such as Ajani Vengeant, Tezzeret, Agent of Bolas and Lotus Cobra, were bought when the full list of MM2 was announced. They haven't seen much play in the current Modern metagame and their trajectory has been flat. However, with more frequent appearance in Modern decklists, their prices could still increase significantly.
Domri Rade hasn't worked out as a speculative call. Although it has held value as a redeemable mythic rare, the hope was that Modern play would drive the price at some point. On that front, it went from fringe Modern playable to not being played at all in the past year. This card should be sold to free up tix, either this week in advance of BFZ release events or at the end of October just prior to the redemption cutoff date.
After potential price weakness due to the release of BFZ, MM2 positions are expected to increase in price again later this Fall. MM2 rares should be the most sensitive to seasonal price drops, while mythics will be more stable and possibly avoid a dip entirely. For example, Fulminator Mage is down from almost 14 Tix earlier this month to what appears to be a floor around 10 Tix.
It was probably preferable to sell Fulminator Mage two weeks ago, but we are confident that another opportunity will occur in the near future, as with other MM2 rares. Following widely predictable cycles, prices are likely to be back up again in two months or less. Finally, the introduction today of Modern Leagues might also boost demand for Modern and thus benefit prices earlier than previously anticipated.
Vintage and Legacy
The outlook for these two formats is not getting better for speculators. For Legacy, the MOCS in November has been a longtime target for any positions in this format. Even with this upcoming event it is uncertain if any substantial benefit will come of our Legacy recommendations. Holding onto the Legacy positions to sell as the event approaches is the only move available at the moment.
As announced last Monday, the introduction of eight-player queues may momentarily sustain or increase prices. At this time, and without a real change in the trend, we still recommend selling any Legacy speculations in the lead-up to the Legacy MOCS.
Vintage should be considered a no-fly zone for speculators. Prices have been drifting down for months with nothing to indicate a reversal anytime soon. Vintage staples keep hitting record low after record low.
Pauper
Pauper is subject to frequent fluctuations, which makes it tricky to make recommendations on the platform of the weekly Market Report. However, the format is popular enough for profitable speculations if you can keep abreast of the shifts.
Eight-players queues will be introduced starting October 7th, and Pauper leagues are the next in line after Modern. Flame Slash and Sunscape Familiar are our current Pauper positions, and they may benefit from these upcoming changes. We will be paying close attention to the evolution of Pauper staples and prices, as they might become even more attractive for players and speculators in the near future.
Targeted Speculative Buying Opportunities
None
Targeted Speculative Selling Opportunities
Modern
It's time to cut this one loose in advance of the redemption cutoff date for Gatecrash. Look for this card to start bleeding value in November and for its price to start a slow and inexorable trend downward.
Although this spec didn't work out, it's possible this card makes a resurgence in Modern at some point. Remember it as a long-shot spec as it bottoms over the winter.
some of your data may be wrong/entered incorrectly. I seriously doubt you bought misty rain forest at 11.1 and then sold at 3.3. Also it seems to me you give up a little to early on some positions. I know you want to avoid dead inventory, but with the cyclical nature of MTGO I almost never sell at a loss. I break even on a lot of cards, but rather than sell for a loss, I would rather hold it for a few extra weeks, months etc.Unless your accidentally buying in at the ceiling i guess? Damnation, Knight of the reliquary, etc,etc would all have been big winner sif ou held on a little longer
Thanks for the comments. There’s in deed a mistake with the Misty Rainforest, I’ll correct that as soon as possible. I’ll also double check others, as it seems that other numbers look odd to me now.
For Damnation for instance, the selling price is inaccurate as the value at the time we recommended selling was around 15 Tix and not 2.7 Tix. The cumulative table is correct on that one though.
KotR has clearly been sold a little bit too early. But this is a rather rare example, and we have counter example where we should have sold earlier and have missed a peak a the time. I would actually argue that we are holding on too long for several positions.
Cycles is what is expected in average but on a case by case basis selling early with a loss is not necessarily a bad thing. It is not easy to track what has been done with the Tix collected from a losing positions being closed. These Tix could be even more profitable elsewhere that waiting for an unsure rebound.
Also, although I agree on the almost inevitability of cycles, especially with Modern, it is not a correct approach to judge a spec few months later while other events have occurred and have affected the price of the spec.
For ex. we are still holding on Vengevine, which has dropped by 50% since we bought it. There’s a long way to go to generate a profit on that one. It may have probably been better to sell it for more ORI positions for instance.
I though about the positive (or negative) impact of a higher inventory turnover. Once the 100Tix1Year project is over it would be interesting to see how the turnover of my positions and thus know the average gain/loss and holding time for my specs. We could do the same type of analysis after one year of MMR recommendations, although we’ll probably be holding a decent amount of open positions.
Also, when you say there are no targeted buying opportunities. do you mean no new ones? Are the cards targeted 2,3 weeks ago still valid targets until you say they are a targeted sell? Your column is the best on the site and I value it very much. My one suggestion is on the targeted cards to be putting in a rough value of what a good price is. For example you said a few weeks ago Rending Volley was a good target, i think it would be better if you said rending volley is a good buy target at less than .12 or something. then it would be useful to go back a few weeks to reread the articles.
Yes, no new ones.
Previous targets remain moslty valid when prices are unchanged or lowered from when we thought they were good buying targets. Some time a new info could make a target less attractive even if the price remains the same or is lower. But in general a good target is a good target as long the price doesn’t increase too much.
That’s a good suggestion. The vast majority of our suggestions are usually more a matter of timing than a matter of price, unless the price gets really too far off the range it is when we recommend it. For the case of Rending Volley for instance, anything between 0.01 and 0.3 is probably a decent price range since we expect this unco to break the 1 Tix bar at some point. This being said, even 0.5 Tix could still be a decent buy and this is where it’s up to each speculator to make the call.
Great to see these picks in such detail. I’ll reiterate my advice from April because it seems like it turned out relevant. After March, I don’t buy anything that is rotating that fall. The theory for your buys was that a couple later major Standard tournaments could cause cards to spike even though they were already relatively high. The Temples of Enlightenment you bought in February and sold in late April turned out great, but the Temples bought in April, wiped that profit off the board. Similarly, recommendations for Battlefield Forge, Courser of Kruphix, Goblin Rabblemaster buys in April did poorly. LLanowar wastes essentially broke even.
This is just a basic analysis from my glancing through the numbers and remembering my opinions from April. It would be good for you to take a closer look at the numbers than I did and maybe decide whether your strategy might need to be slightly altered on those cards rotating out in 6 months or less. For certain, there are cards that do amazingly late in their Standard term, but they are few and far between compared to the normal trend.