menu

The State of MTGO Speculation

Are you a Quiet Speculation member?

If not, now is a perfect time to join up! Our powerful tools, breaking-news analysis, and exclusive Discord channel will make sure you stay up to date and ahead of the curve.

I. MTGO Content is Back!

It's been a while since I last wrote an MTGO finance article for QS—since just before Christmas actually, when prices on MTGO were in freefall. Like most of you with MTGO collections, I was despondent as the value of my cards fell precipitously, and I was worried about what was transpiring on the platform.

Of course, what made it worse is that much of it was not under my control or something I could easily predict the end of. How would Alli Medwin deal with treasure chests? How many people would continue to play Standard on the platform? Would people stop playing Modern, Legacy, and Pauper altogether in favor of Arena? How many would continue to do Limited on MTGO?

It has been a difficult several months for me. Amidst this uncertainty, I've had to question my own engagement with Magic and MTGO. As longtime QS readers know, I use speculation on MTGO as a primary means to finance playing on MTGO. I love drafting and cubing, and those are costly to do unless you're subsidizing it with sustained returns from speculation and investment.

II. Is there a Path Forward for MTGO Speculation?

This is a question I've been mulling over for several months, and I'm happy to say that I believe the answer is yes.

Matt Lewis is currently writing about a new strategy for investing in mythics and foil mythics, and I will be incorporating that strategy into my portfolio. I'm also happy to say that I think traditional speculation is now viable again, although the timing windows for investment will likely be different than those I established in my Calendar Guide.

What I'd like to do today is go over some new baseline facts for MTGO investing. The first key is understanding what has changed about MTGO in the wake of Arena.

1) Supply is lower than at any time in recent memory.

Fewer people are playing Draft and Sealed on MTGO, at least in comparison to Kaladesh block in 2016-2017, when MTGO introduced leagues. Contrary to some of the apocalyptic and dismissive language we sometimes hear, there are still plenty of Limited players on MTGO.

It's hard to look at numbers of league participants alone to determine just how steep the drop-off is, but overall each Limited league has between 30% and 50% less participants than it did during the heights of Dominaria. The drop-off has been more acute in the competitive leagues than in the friendly and intermediate leagues.

2) Redemption accounts for a greater portion of demand than ever before.

Alongside the drop in influx supply, digital demand for that supply has also plummeted. During October and November, there were roughly 3,000 people in the Standard leagues. In February and March, that number was closer to 900.

Guilds of Ravnica and Ravnica Allegiance supply has been decent at satisfying demand (only decent though, more on that below). But Ixalan, Rivals of IxalanDominaria, and Core 2019 all have way too much supply for their present demand. Those sets were drafted before Arena entered open beta, and so there is a glut of supply. Hence:

Unlike the sets before it, Guilds of Ravnica will not crater as steeply once its redemption period ends in May, simply because there's less supply to go around. The same is doubly true for Ravnica Allegiance, which has even less supply than Guilds of Ravnica (lower rate of drafting, and less time being drafted).

From the speculator's perspective, Guilds of Ravnica should be viewed as a transition set. Personally I'm going to stick more to investing in Ravnica Allegiance and War of the Spark because of uncertainty about Guilds of Ravnica.

What seems true about both GRN and RNA, though, is this: Supply and digital demand are low enough to where redemption is eating up an outsized percentage of demand. In fact, it could be argued that the influx of supply is too low to meet the demand for redemption.

3) A new normal is being reached.

What speculators need is stability, and we're finally getting that. The bloodletting appears to be over.

Standard and Limited participation numbers seem to have stabilized; if anything, they'll likely return to slow growth. Modern continues to grow in popularity on MTGO, up 50% from earlier this year. (Much of this is expected, as interest in Standard wanes. I've personally found it impossible to will myself to play a single Arena ladder game for weeks, and I know I'm not alone.) Pauper and Legacy have seen increases in popularity as well, up 40% and 10% respectively from earlier this year.

A new equilibrium for supply and demand is being reached. This is why card values on MTGO are broadly going up, and why the value of event tickets has stabilized, fluctuating between $0.75 to $0.80. (Note: Do not purchase event tickets from the MTGO Store. Purchase them from reputable card chains for about $0.89 instead for a solid 11% discount).

After talking with one of the bot chains, I believe the selloff is over. Ticket prices are low right now because there's a glut of them in the system. We should expect this price to go back up as more sets get redeemed and players buy tickets from bot chains instead of the MTGO Store. I'm hoping the value of a ticket will be back up to $0.85 by this fall.

But the important point is that participation on the platform appears to be stable—and is therefore once again something predictable we can have confidence in.

Thus I am confident that the savvy speculator will be able to generate good returns on Standard cards based around the same three modes of exploitation as before: redemption, seasonal set cycles and rotations, and metagame changes.

III. Treasure Chests: What is Different and What is the Same?

As I argued in my December article, treasure chests are the primary driver behind collapsing eternal card prices. For this reason Matt and I have strongly cautioned QS readers against investing in Eternal cards for quite a while, and we will continue to do so.

Treasure chests are still being used to pump extra Eternal supply into the system. While speculation on Standard cards is possible and potentially lucrative, speculating on Eternal cards should only be done with an eye toward short-term gains. I don't think there's ever a good reason to speculate on an Eternal card with the intention of holding it for more than two months.

What has changed since December is that the Standard commons and uncommons have been removed from the chests, making one of my favorite investment strategies viable again—investing in cheap uncommons. Ravnica Allegiance is still being drafted, and yet three uncommons still remain above bulk:

IV. Wrapping Up: What to Expect in the Upcoming Days

Please leave any questions for me here or in the QS Discord and I'll get back to you. There's honestly way too much to talk about for one article, so your questions will be essential for fleshing everything out. There are even implications for paper finance as well that I didn't discuss here.

Next week I'll be releasing an article about speculating on Ravnica Allegiance cards. Thanks for reading, and I'll see y'all next time!

Kyle Rusciano

Kyle started playing Magic with his little brother when they saw some other kids at a baseball camp playing. His grandma bought them some Portal: Second Age decks, and a hobby was born. Kyle played from Weatherlight through Invasion, then took a lengthy break until 2013. Now a PhD student in the humanities, the Greek mythology component of Theros compelled Kyle to return to the game. He enjoys playing Pauper and Limited as well as focusing on MTGO finance and card design. Follow him on Twitter at @KangaMage!

View More By Kyle Rusciano

Posted in Finance, Free, Magic Card Market Theory, Modern, MTGO, Ravnica Allegiance, StandardTagged , ,

Have you joined the Quiet Speculation Discord?

If you haven't, you're leaving value on the table! Join our community of experts, enthusiasts, entertainers, and educators and enjoy exclusive podcasts, questions asked and answered, trades, sales, and everything else Discord has to offer.

Want to create content with Quiet Speculation?

All you need to succeed is a passion for Magic: The Gathering, and the ability to write coherently. Share your knowledge of MTG and how you leverage it to win games, get value from your cards – or even turn a profit.

10 thoughts on “The State of MTGO Speculation

  1. I snapped up 184 copies of Cindervines on MGTO.

    I don’t play Magic at all but as someone who

    is a beginner chartist and trader I saw that

    price of the card held pretty well despite the

    blood bath of the last few months. If the card was

    worthless it be 10 cents or less. I may take a

    bath on this one but I think players realize it has

    some potential to have sustained the price at a

    reasonable level. Will hold on for at least the rest

    of this year to see what becomes of it.

      1. Upped my position to just over 250 digital Cindervines. The other traders don’t like hoarders as I’ve found out. Oh well, anyways I’m the one holding the bag if Im wrong about this card. I really see a bull market coming for Ravnica.

        1. How did you manage to get so many copies? Was there a bot/dealer willing to let you buy a ton of them at once?

          I, too, get frustrated when the bot chain companies get all moralistic and condemn hoarders. Despite doing business with Cardhoarder all the time, they’ve condemned me as a “hoarder” and have never apologized for it. What are bot chains besides hoarders themselves? As we’ve seen over the past few years, investors are essential to the health of the platform, and these botchains would be wise to remember that.

          1. I ordered 24 from MTGO Traders and they allowed the trade to go through despite telling me that only 4 per day can be bought. I did the same with cardhoarder, only I ordered around 32 by ordering 4 at a time in quick succession. Needless to say in the end both Cardhoarder and MTGO Traders banned me. I can’t blame them but this is a very heavy limitation as it skews the secondary market to those market makers and allows them time to adjust to new prices at their pace, which is not really an open and efficient market. The rest of the cards I bought by searching for Cindervines though I had to be careful since I quickly hit their daily sell limits and they are “monkey see/monkey do” and keep tabs on card prices in real time. I had to spread my buys over several days. The biggest traders on MTGO are the biggest hoarders themselves, they just view every customer as a potential rival unfortunately. Now I probably have the largest stock of Cindervines outside of the largest bot chains and just going to sit pretty on them. On a side note, after buying so many of 1 single card, I’ve noticed that many bots with different names are actually part of the same company and so there are really only about 10 bots, in my opinion, that handle over 70% of all transactions. It’s a rigged game in my opinion. Maybe I don’t understand the mechanics and there are many many independent resellers but thats what it looks like to me.

  2. Other developments that have helped card prices:

    •Treasure Chests were changed to include more playpoints

    •Cardhoarder opened their loan program (increases demand for cards and allows players to hedge against TC printing and falling card prices)

  3. Can you name some “reputable card chains ”

    (Note: Do not purchase event tickets from the MTGO Store. Purchase them from reputable card chains for about $0.89 instead for a solid 11% discount).

    I am from Turkey and our exchange rate compare to USD is awful. So it would really help me, if i can buy some cheap tickets.

    Plus it was a really nice read men thanks.

Join the conversation

Want Prices?

Browse thousands of prices with the first and most comprehensive MTG Finance tool around.


Trader Tools lists both buylist and retail prices for every MTG card, going back a decade.