Prelude to the Ban Update

Are you a Quiet Speculation member?

If not, now is a perfect time to join up! Our powerful tools, breaking-news analysis, and exclusive Discord channel will make sure you stay up to date and ahead of the curve.

Next week, we will receive a Banned/Restricted list update. This is at the forefront of everyone's mind due to the overwhelming and continual dominance of the Caw-Blade archetype in Standard, but the DCI may take action in other formats as well.


Caw-Blade is so overpowering that it doesn't have a bad matchup. When Jund was the best deck in standard (a title which was lost when Rise of the Eldrazi was released), it at least had an awful matchup against monored decks. When Faeries was the best deck in standard, US Nationals had a top 8 with 32 copies of Great Sable Stag and 31 copies of Volcanic Fallout. It was possible to hate out both of those decks. Caw-Blade? Not so much. Unlike Faeries, Caw has the tools to deal with anything people throw at it. Vengevine? Meet Condemn or Oust. Torpor Orb? Meet Spell Pierce and Divine Offering. The deck simply is capable of being built to handle any threat that is posed to it, and the only reason people are having even slight success with decks like Elves or Vampires is that the Caw-Blade players are warping their deck to fight the mirror so much that they're not even playing sweepers or Gideon Jura.

Furthermore, the Open Vampires won in Indianapolis was one which every SCG player over 15 points was playing in the Invitational. The following Open, also won by Vampires, coincided with Pro Tour: Nagoya, which several SCG series regulars were attending. What did the Invitational Standard format look like? Caw-Blade everywhere.

Despite the claims of those who say this format is amazing because the more skilled player wins the mirror the vast majority of the time, deckbuilding and metagaming should count for something. Tournaments should be something more than a test of the same mirror match every round.

So, what needs to be banned to fix this problem? The most popular options are Stoneforge Mystic and Jace, the Mind Sculptor.

Jace, the Mind Sculptor

Banning Jace, the Mind Sculptor isn't really a solution to the Caw-Blade problem. It was a popular subject of discussion after 4 Caw-Blade and 4 RUG decks made top 8 of pre-NPH Grand Prix: Dallas, but Jace isn't the key to Caw-Blade. It's obviously a good card - probably too good at that - but it's a card which can and has been fought successfully in the past. If Jace were an $8 card instead of an $80 card, I doubt the calls for its banning would have ever reached the level they peaked at. It was an issue that every deck that was doing well was a Jace deck, but at least there were multiples, and decks like monored remained viable to punish the other players for taking too long.

Then New Phyrexia got printed and Caw-Blade gained Batterskull and Sword of War and Peace to make racing it all but impossible.

So what are the fringe decks with any success since NPH came out? Twin, RUG, Bluemanji, Boros, Vampires, and Elves. The first 3 are Jace decks. What happens if Jace and only Jace gets banned? They probably disappear entirely. What happens to Caw-Blade? People either stick to blue for the countermagic or switch to red and play Boros so they can continue to lay down turn 2 Mystic into turn 3 Batterskull, or stick Swords on Squadron Hawk.

With all that said, if Wizards decides to ban something, Jace is quite likely to be on the chopping block.

Stoneforge Mystic

Banning Stoneforge Mystic yanks the ridiculous engine out from under Caw-Blade, turning it back into Kibler's Caw-Go deck. It loses the ability to drop Batterskull and simply lifelink its way past any aggro deck, but can still put up a lifegain plan if deck builders decide to run the equipment the hard way. The free wins go away, but the deck remains. This is the ideal ban, and would be a blatantly obvious decision.

Except for one thing.

Stoneforge Mystic is in an event deck. A deck which people are supposed to be able to open up and play in FNM. This is a problem. There's precedent - Skullclamp was banned even though it was in a precon. Unfortunately, that was under a different marketing system. The only saving grace here is that it is now possible for FNM to be made Extended, and WotC could do a last-minute marketing push to get the stores to label the Stoneforge deck as an "Extended Event Deck" or some such. This is still a poor situation, since the deck doesn't have any cards from the larger format, but this would still be a terrible position to put new players in.

This is the best single card by far to ban to fix the format, but it would be an incredibly hard decision for Wizards to make.


So why not skip Mystic and ban Batterskull instead? This leaves the deck intact, but takes away the free wins.

Let's look at history. Caw-Blade was the best deck before Batterskull got printed. It'll probably continue to be the best deck. Let's turn to ancient history. Specifically, the last time cards got banned in Standard.

Going in to our meetings that would ultimately lead to this eight-card ban, we knew the goal was to make a statement. We had to alter the reality of the format, but we also had to let the world know without a doubt that we “slew the dragon” as it were.

Taking away Batterskull doesn't do this. What would the reaction of the player base be if they ban a card because Caw-Blade is the best deck... and then Caw-Blade wins the next major event? Wizards looks dumb, Jace is still too expensive for a large number of players to afford, and nothing's really changed. Sure, monored gets better, but does this really change all that much? Caw-Blade goes back to playing Mortarpod, Sword of War and Peace still lets them lifelink away, and it is still in all likelihood the best deck in the format.

Batterskull could be banned, but if it's the only card banned, it won't change very much.

Jace and Stoneforge Mystic

Ding dong, the witch is dead. Banning both Jace, the Mind Sculptor and Stoneforge Mystic leaves no doubt that Caw-Blade is eliminated as a deck, and people won't simply swap the blue half of the deck (as little as 8-10 cards in some cases) for another color.

Some people have postulated that in a world without Caw-Blade, Splinter Twin or Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle becomes dominant. I don't believe that. It might have been true that Valakut would have locked out certain "not fast enough" aggro decks before New Phyrexia thanks to Overgrown Battlement, Slagstorm and Pyroclasm, but now, there's plenty of power to go around. Every color has access to Dismember to solve the Splinter Twin problem, and the aggro players can reload with Shrine of Burning Rage, get out of red sweeper range with Tempered Steel, or play a tempo game and counter sweepers with Spell Pierce and Unified Will or Corrupted Resolve.

It's true that a lot of people would just fall back to Valakut or Twin early on, since they're at least obviously good enough; but the demise of Caw-Blade gives us breathing room to build decks with a different core.

This, of course, also requires Wizards to figure out a way to explain to the new players why they can't play with the event deck they just bought.

Jace and Batterskull

The worst of Mystic's abuse gets axed from the format here, and with Jace gone there's no real incentive to play the rest of the Caw-Blade shell. Boros and Green-White Vengevine decks will pick up where Caw-Blade left off, but they'll at least have to pay equip costs and risk losing tempo to removal spells.

This plan probably has the largest intersection of how good it would be for the health of the format combined with how likely Wizards is to do it.

Nuke it from Orbit

The only way to be sure, a full format reset would axe Jace, the Mind Sculptor, Stoneforge Mystic, Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle, Splinter Twin (or Deceiver Exarch), and just knock out all the top decks in a single swing; basically putting everyone back at square one. This seems extremely unlikely - I can't see Wizards deciding to ban Twin or Valakut without those decks actually doing anything to the format yet - but would prevent the format from stabilizing with one of the current second-tier decks at the top.


Nothing's currently banned in Extended. When the format rotates prior to the presumed Spring PTQ season, it will lose Lorwyn block (good riddance, Faeries), and pick up Innistrad. With Stoneforge Mystic rotating out of Standard, I can't see Wizards pre-emptively banning it in Extended, and there are no other cards I'd seriously consider getting a ban there. The upside is people who are angry about their Caw-Blade deck getting banned have what's likely to be a tier 1 deck ready for Extended anyway. Some discussion I've had with Corbin Hosler on twitter has led us to conclude that Bant-Blade with Sovereigns of Lost Alara and Eldrazi Conscription is the obvious deck going into the new format.


Modern was a big hit at the community cup, so it's possible Wizards will announce Modern as a real format. If so, Hypergenesis may get added to the ban list.


Mental Misstep shook this format up a great deal. It's likely that Wizards doesn't want to tweak Legacy right now, but if it continues to stabilize around the same few blue decks, there are a few ways available to shake up the format.

First off, let's talk about the 51 new Commander cards.

Flusterstorm, Homeward Path, and Scavenging Ooze have some degree of Legacy application. Flusterstorm is a Spell Pierce that's better in a counter war and a Storm hate card that's not dead elsewhere. The drawback is it can't counter Jace. This is potentially the card that would see the most play.

Homeward Path is a niche land, but it's extremely potent in its niche, neutering theft effects like Sower of Temptation and Vedalken Shackles. It's an immediate 1-of in Knight of the Reliquary decks. Mind Harness and Threads of Disloyalty suffer greatly from this printing.

Scavenging Ooze is only of note because it is a graveyard hate creature which can be fetched via Green Sun's Zenith. Otherwise, there are better options.

None of these has a very strong overall effect on Legacy, and none of them will drastically alter the format. So, what would it take to pull Legacy out of its current Blue Period?

Ban Mental Misstep

This would immediately re-diversify the format to where it was before. Still, we've never seen Wizards ban a counterspell for being too good, and it's possible Wizards considers Misstep's impact on Legacy a good thing. Among other reasons, it removes all possible need for them to ban the extremely expensive Candelabra of Tawnos.

Still, this isn't happening for at least a year, and the format would have to get in pretty dire straits for this to happen even then. Misstep is in some ways a self-regulating card, but since Spell Snare also exists, people can't reasonably be expected to build decks that dodge them entirely.
(As an aside: a Force of Will ban is almost certainly out of the question - FoW is regarded as an "escape valve" for when things would otherwise be far too broken.)

Unban Earthcraft

Let me get this straight. With two enchantments (Earthcraft plus Squirrel Nest) and a basic land, I can make infinite tokens and win the next turn.


We're talking about Legacy here. This combo is exactly 2 mana cheaper than the Standard infinite combo, doesn't have the luxury of Flashing out its first piece on its opponent's endstep, and exists in a world with Force of Will.

Why is this banned?

Okay, okay, there's applications elsewhere. Nettle Sentinel plus Earthcraft... wait, what? Heritage Druid exists, and you can actually tutor for that with Summoner's Pact!

It could fit into Enchantress decks, allowing people to tap Argothian Enchantress to untap a land which has multiple Wild Growths and Utopia Sprawls attached, but that's not a big deal- they're already drawing most of their deck, laying Serra's Sanctum or Carpet of Flowers, and casting Emrakul, the Aeons Torn on the same turn Earthcraft would let them anyway.

Taking Earthcraft off the banned list would be doing us all a favor by making the list shorter, but wouldn't change the format very much at all. This seems like it should be a real possibility.

Unban Land Tax

Land Tax isn't broken, and is a solid way to encourage people to play larger numbers of basic lands. The downside is it slows games down further, drags things out further with Sensei's Divining Top, and fuels what was once considered a degenerate card-drawing engine with Scroll Rack.

Now, let's all go look at the effect of Land Tax and Scroll Rack. You search your library for 3 lands. You then Rack away 2 of them, spending 1 mana, and draw 2 fresh cards. There are now 2 lands on top of your library. (If you have extra lands, you rack away all but 1 so you can make your drop for the turn, unless you have enough. Then you rack away all of them.)

That sounds kind of familiar. Let's all read Jace, the Mind Sculptor again... are we really going to play Tax and Rack, or are we just going to Brainstorm away the spare lands?

Either way, Land Tax is either the most powerful long-term card advantage engine in Legacy, or not good enough to play at all. That's exactly the sort of thing which isn't going to get unbanned.

Unban Mystical Tutor

With Mental Misstep's existence, does Mystical Tutor really need to stay on the banned list? Control players can simply employ the "counter the tutor" technique of old, while combo players regain some consistency. I can't see Wizards unbanning Mystical so soon, but it's worth keeping in mind for the future.

Unban Worldgorger Dragon

The classic 2-card combo is Worldgorger Dragon plus Animate Dead, with Necromancy as a backup. Then, while your permanents are blinking in and out of play, you tap your lands until you've got millions of mana and then decide that the Animate Dead is going to bring back Shivan Hellkite instead.

This is basically straight up worse than Necrotic Ooze reanimator if you're using Buried Alive to fill the graveyard!

So, why's this on the banned list at all? Well, for starters, if there's nothing else in the graveyard and no way to ever get a non-Dragon creature in the graveyard, then the game ends up in an unbreakable infinite loop, which forces a draw. Dragon matches often go to 4 or 5 games because the Dragon player will force a draw instead of a loss, and that's not something Wizards wants to see people doing. Cards like Char and Earthquake do it from time to time, but not with the maddening frequency of the Dragon deck. This is going to stay on the banned list even though it's an inferior strategy for the same reasons as Shahrazad.


I don't follow Vintage, but there's some logic for restricting Preordain to go with the existing Brainstorm and Ponder restrictions.


It's fairly likely that something will get banned in Standard. Stoneforge Mystic is the best option by far, but due to outside circumstances it's not likely. If Wizards actually does ban Mystic, they deserve a round of praise for being willing to make the hard decision. Banning Batterskull plus Jace would probably shake the format up well enough to restore interest, but Mystic is probably still a central card to the format.

There are a few cards in Legacy which might warrant unbanning, Earthcraft and Mystical Tutor the most prominent among them, but given how recent Misstep's shakeup of the format is, it's unlikely that Wizards will follow through on it.

Joshua Justice

@JoshJMTG on Twitter

12 thoughts on “Prelude to the Ban Update

    1. Squadron Hawk was in the early brews of Caw-Go that came out of Worlds, when the deck was good but not dominating. Today many lists aren't even running the Hawk, opting for Mirran Crusader instead.

  1. Aaron Forsythe has tweeted that the event decks with Stoneforge went to print last year when SFM was a $4 card in response to the event deck argument. I don’t think that the event deck is anywhere near as big a factor as you’re making it out to be. When it comes down to an event deck having a banned card (that still sees huge amounts of play across multiple other formats) and 6 months of events bleeding players, they’re going to choose the health of Standard every single time.

  2. "but it’s a card which can and has been fought successfully in the past. If Jace were an $8 card instead of an $80 card, I doubt the calls for its banning would have ever reached the level they peaked at."

    I really want to comment on this point. You spin the hypothesis, "if Jace were an $8 dollar card" to essentially argue that he's a fair (or at least, not ban-worthy) card. This is beyond the myopic. The expense of this one card is a significant factor in the calls for a ban, _and that is why those calls are justified_.

    It's not because people are cheap, either.

    It's because Jace is good (and some supply issues, but he's a mythic. Wizards knew he was going to be scarce) that Jace is as expensive as he is. You see, if you need a card in order to compete, you'll pay up to the point where it becomes a perceived loss just to buy the card. Jace is $400 a playset because that's the barrier to entry to competitive play.

    Magic is a game of markets and metagames. You pony up the cash or you come up with an answer to the top deck. The answer to Jace is a card advantage engine that is nearly as good *that precludes Jace from being used alongside it.*

    Bloodbraid Elf wasn't an answer to Jace all by her lonesome. It was Bloodbraid with Blightning, Lightning Bolt, and Maelstrom Pulse that were answers to Jace. 3 direct damage kills him. Pulse kills him, 3 damage and discard two MURDERS him. Two spells for the price of one makes counterspells worse, and there was no Mana Leak to back him up. And Bloodbraid gets in a swing with haste before she can be bounced, NOT THAT YOU'D WANT TO. That's the engine of an entire deck that works counter to Jace's plans before he even made them.

    Now we fight the $80 Jace with the $8 Jace. Maybe a Hex Parasite? And Spellskite? Beast Within? Bad cards that let the Jace player keep their card advantage. I'm not impressed.

    Stoneforge, on the other hand, already has the world set against her. Great targeted discard spells punish players for playing her too early (Inquisition grabs Sword, Duress gets Skulls, too). Then she's just a frumpy Squire. Heck, despise takes HER.

    Not to mention the nice suite of artifact hate available in the other colors: Manic Vandal, Divine Offering, Nature's Claim. Hell, Steel Sabotage is probably underplayed due to its ability to work as an unsummon on opposing swords and batterskulls if it misses the ability to counter them due to the work of SF Mystic. The Stoneforge player has to use multiple cards to accomplish a given task, and is vulnerable to cheap, instant-speed removal or burn, and those colors have a plethora of option to deal with a resolved Batterskull anyway.

    Anyway, Jace is so expensive because he's so good he should be banned. Stoneforge is this format's Knight of the Reliquary: a break-out hit that makes the best card better. Knight was played alongside Jace in the best deck at the end of last Standard format. It's a toolbox card that lets players play with fewer of the even-rarer Swords.

    Jace is so good that he's played in completely off-color decks with relatively bad mana (Lotus Cobra goes a long way, fetch lands are great, but there are no UG or UR duals to make RUG. I mean, look at that monstrosity. It can compete nearly toe-to-toe with Stoneforge on the merits of Lotus Cobra and Titans. You better believe it still needs Jace.

    Look at Boros. This deck has fallen out of favor despite the initial conceptions that it had a good matchup with Caw-blade. Why didn't it do well, if it runs the ban-worthy Stoneforge Mystic alongside the same equipment as Caw-blade.

    The argument for banning Stoneforge is almost as specious as the argument presented on DailyMTG for banning Preordain. It's clearly not the issue. I think the amount of press about her being potentially banned is unwarranted, despite her clear power level. Decks that play her win. Show me another Stoneforge Mystic deck that's been putting up results, and I'll show you two more Jace decks that have been beating it. Stop deflecting blame.

    That said, I'd be perfectly happy to ride out Standard, and let Jace-haters and Jace-players bicker in the back seat while I play whatever the hell I want because that's how I roll.

    (Full disclosure: I have cast Stoneforge Mystic in Standard and Legacy, and I enjoyed it. She's in the same league as Bob, but he was never a candidate for banning. Granted, Ravnica Standard presented a pretty diverse meta, but that's a whole other topic of discussion.)

    1. Oh man, that post was a train-wreck of questionable grammar and punctuation. Hopefully I didn't murder my credibility too hard. Here's some extra punctuation and spelling to make it up: ,,,…??? 't, 'd));;

      Sprinkle those as you wish. Hopefully, that makes it a bit more tolerable to read.

  3. I gotta say the Event Deck defense to keep SFM is paper thin, and if WotC cites that as the reason they don't ban SFM, I will have to start calling their judgment into question. They can still be run in Extended, and they aren't even legal if the FNM is block.

    To be honest, if nothing gets done, it's Block FNMs for us until October. This is just unbearable.

    1. I don't like using the Event Decks as justification to not ban a card, but it WOULD be extremely confusing to new players. That's the real justification.

      If they do end up banning Stoneforge Mystic, future event decks will be even crappier, if not nonexistent.

  4. "I don’t follow Vintage, but there’s some logic for restricting Preordain to go with the existing Brainstorm and Ponder restrictions."

    If you don't have anything nice to say, it's best to say nothing at all.

    Maybe you could talk about the article one of QS's other sometime authors, Stephen Menendian, wrote arguing for the unrestriction of Fact or Fiction. (Disclaimer: I'm the William he co-wrote it with.)

  5. My hunch is that the DCI will not be banning anything on June 20th. Both JTMS and SFM are rotating out in the fall, so it's a different situation from Affinity, where you still had a whole block to get through before rotation. There's still the possibility that someone will discover the tech necessary to beat Caw-Blade in NPH, and we also have the possibility of new tools in Magic 2012. Is it possible that the falling tournament attendance is partly due to the increased number of tournaments? It may be that the number of competitive players is not rising fast enough to maintain attendance levels, especially if less skilled players are dropping out because they are getting frustrated at the lack of variance. Also, with so many tournaments each month, deck evolution is much quicker than it used to be, so that a format gets "solved" within weeks of a new set release. Reducing the number of tournaments, which is a likely result of falling attendance anyway, would help reverse this trend.

  6. OMG that card is really good.. better than the cards in my deck.. therefore it should be banned !! there are are many answers for the cards that you want to get banned.. ever heard of artifact removal ? just cause this format has no o-rings or pulses doesnt mean you shouldn't run things like naturalize, shatter, divine offering, into the roil.. well black can't deal with artifacts cause they cheat … plus they always print something in the core set for the dominant deck, great sable stag – fairies / obsinate baloth – jund/ blightning.. so quit your crying.. sound like a bunch of babies .. oohh i cant cant win.. ban that whole deck so i can make top 8 in my fmn.. you guys act like caw-blade is unbeatable.. dont get me wrong its a very strong deck.. but not unbeatable..

Join the conversation

Want Prices?

Browse thousands of prices with the first and most comprehensive MTG Finance tool around.

Trader Tools lists both buylist and retail prices for every MTG card, going back a decade.