This has been making the rounds on the internet, and it's pretty funny.

The video, in classic "Downfall parody style" uses English subtitles to tell a story irrespective of the actual dialogue that English speakers won't understand. It's a tale about out-of-touch Wizards policies regarding Modern. I wouldn't watch it at work, necessarily, but when you get a chance to enjoy this in a non-work environment, you'll get a kick out of it. I don't agree with all of the conclusions the creator came to, but the laughter is infectious. You'll see. Enjoy!

How much do we agree with what the video says about Jace being too good to be unbanned?

Remember CardMageddon? I was really excited about the idea at first, but the execution was sorely lacking. The independently run GP-prize-level tournament was a dismal failure at every conceivable level, but as discussed previously, the owner had a good attitude about it.

Well, apparently that good attitude was just meant to throw people off the scent, because word is that players aren't getting paid.

Players have asked on MTG Salvation and Reddit how to pursue this, and per those threads, it looks like all the major figures associated with this event have gone dark for the last month or two.

With the big caveat that I am not a lawyer nor a tournament organizer, I fear that these players may just be out of luck here, but maybe a community-minded MTG-playing attorney can help out in some way. This whole situation is a real shame. We'll keep you updated if anything new comes to light.

There was an interesting  discussion today on the main Magic subreddit that you may find interesting. The question posed by /u/mtgnew was "Would you still play Magic if every card would be $ max?" In the middle of a week where we've already seen people use the upcoming Tempest block MODO drafts and other events to resurrect the age-old gripe-fest about the Reserved List, I wasn't really prepared to see more misguided opinions about MTG Finance. Still, I slogged through it. There are some... interesting perspectives but there is a lot of the same whining, too. I was heartened that the farther I scrolled down, the more pragmatic and intelligent the opinions seemed, which just goes to show that redditors upvote what they wish were true and not what is. Still, for the most part, a lot of people seemed to recognize that the game being that affordable would kill it. If cards were so cheap, there would be no incentive for anyone to pull and mail singles to you. You would have to buy a lot of sealed product to ensure that you have enough copies of every card you wanted and you would be left with a LOT of leftover cards you didn't want. Either the pack price would price people out of the game, or Wizards would make boosters super cheap or sell cards as a full set, further reducing their incentive to keep making cards.

Do yourself a favor and read a few of the comments in the thread. It's interesting to see what people outside of finance think about the financial consequences of them getting their way and living in a fairy tale reality where cards are free and rain from the sky like Manna rocks from heaven. If nothing else, it will give you a nice chuckle.

So what do we think? Would the game survive if cards were $1 or less?

Most Magic players have entertained the idea of working at Wizards of the Coast at one point or another. I mean, making a career of designing one of greatest games ever created? Who wouldn't consider such a thing to be insanely attractive? (Terrorists: that's who.)

That's why it makes me sad to report that working at Wizards may not be all sunshine and roses. I mean, this may not be enough to completely kill your desire to make Magic cards, but Glassdoor—a site where employees and former employees anonymously review their employers—indicates that WOTC is perhaps not the greatest place to work.

Oof, only 2.5 stars? That's a failing grade in schools that don't coddle their students. Let's see what employees have had to say about different aspects of working at the company (all quotes are SIC).

Technology/IT

As a disappointed MTGO player (is there any other kind?), one thing that interests me most is what internal employees have to say about the technology utilized and marketed by the company.

IT is old and out of date.

Upper IT leadership is lost and threatened by new ideas and talent. They make sure those people are diminished until they leave or find a way to get rid of them.

The Web Publishing team is a complete disaster, failing to deliver anything of significance technologically and the latest project was a colossal failure by any measure.

Magic Online Business team leadership is unqualified

Architecture actively works to keep projects from being successful. Their assumptions are not based on fact, rather on outdated poorly understood interpretation of how modern technology works.

Completely incompetent at implementing any kind of digital media. I was tossed into a web design team even though I had no experience in and was not hired for coding. Had to deal with contracted web app companies that could not care less. I was placed almost exclusively in teams that had little to do with the job I'd been hired to perform.

If you're a software developer, stay far away. Wizards is not a software company, and its software projects are buggy, slow, bloated, and poorly thought-out. Random changes will come down from marketing or management. Key technical decisions will be made by non-technical staff. You will work in Waterfall, whether you like it or not. You will be underpaid (Wizards pays below market for most positions), and blamed for the failures of the products you work on.

People in the Technology org are making their entire careers on software that is over budget and behind schedule.

Technology teams frequently underdeliver but are chronically understaffed and can't source talent because salaries are so far below market.

Lack of Innovation/Diversity

As a creative type, I like to think working at Wizards would give me the opportunity to innovate and do something new. But word is that this isn't really looked kindly upon at WOTC.

2 trick pony. Magic and D&D. If it isn't named that it's not going to fly. Don't get your hopes up about a new game you made. Even if they like it, and say they want to do it, it won't get published. But they will own your idea from then on.

Zero commitment to innovate and "risk" upsetting Magic. Any time someone questions ANYTHING, rather than owning mistakes and committing to get better as a group, people retreat to defensive positions and lash out, especially the bottom of the barrel people who are lucky to have jobs at all - the rejects from other companies that will actually take the well-below-market salaries WotC pays.

In my experience, if you are honest, work hard and come up with innovation ideas, you are punished with more work, leaders stealing your ideas, and moved to positions where you're no longer doing what you were hired to do.

Wizards seems to want only want employees who think and look like them; diversity is a talking point not part of Wizards culture.

If you want to do anything new and innovative, stay away (unless you can get into Magic R&D - see above). Innovation is unwelcome at Wizards. Between the politics, cost-cutting, and top-down direction, new ideas are seen as actively bad, and promoting them can severely limit your career.

New ideas are not encouraged. For a company that lives and dies by its IPs, they are remarkably resistant towards encouraging innovation or new products.

Invisible management who have their heads in the sand and are afraid to innovate or take risks. Management's attitude is to coast and just not mess a good thing up.

If you have a will or wanting to create or work on something big, this isn't the place. The business doesn't act like it wants to succeed and won't even properly fund it's biggest money makers.

Opportunities for creative projects on the side are stymied by a draconian non-compete policy.

We kill a lot of good game ideas before they are able to reach the market. It makes me wonder what might have been.

Advancement in the Company

If you're an overachiever type, Wizards may not be the place for you.

Very hard to advance from one position to the next. Once you are in a particular role, you may need to leave the company to try new opportunities.

Very low chance to advance, you will be told you can, but what you need to do changes all the time so you will not succeed at it.

No upward mobility. But if you're basing your career at this company, you've got bigger problems.

Hardworking, smart, talented people move on to other companies, leaving behind the people who either can’t get a job anywhere else or are too lazy or depressed to try. There are a few exceptions, of course, but HR will see to it that they don’t stay around too long. They’ll have them apply for “consideration” of a title change or pay increase, withholding all assistance during that process – even for individuals worth retaining – ensuring that the success rate stays somewhere below 3%.

Career development is extremely difficult

People who do less work but more talk usually get promoted. That's because there's no accountability or task monitoring. If you're a PM who does nothing, this is a job for you!

Slow/ no promotion track.

No room for growth without being part of an executive manager's inner circle.

Lack of career advancement opportunities, favoritism from senior management towards "friends" when promoting employees, the cultural environment is that of gamers so if you aren't a herd core gamer you may find it difficult to breach the political favoritism entrenched within the company.

There is no room for advancement. Someone has to retire or die before you get promoted above manager, and even then they will probably bring in someone from outside.

Compensation

Do you like to be paid a fair market rate for your work? Wizards employees suggest going elsewhere may be your best bet:

Health benefits are awful, with massive out-of-pocket costs

Wages are some of the worst in the industry. What this means in real life is that often the first, second, and third choices for Director or upper level management positions walk away from the job. The individual hired often works for 35-40% below the Seattle market, has little actual experience in the gaming industry or in any complex IT environment, and often lacks the management or personnel skills needed to address the most egregious issues.

Stagnant salaray - raises or increases in salary very very rare.

compensation is very east coast and way below industry standards

Pay scale is well below market.

Lower-than-market salaries often makes this place a stepping stone to other companies that care more about their talent.

Financial success not shared with rank-and-file employees or reflected in office environment, which is tightly packed, "Office Space" style cubicles; Yearly raises are nearly nonexistent

Salaries are generally 20% lower than at comparable companies and opportunities for advancement are sporadic.

Horrible raises and have lower than average salaries.

The salaries are too low for the people they need.

Management

I've had great jobs ruined by horrible bosses and horrible jobs made downright pleasant by great bosses. What is the Wizards company culture like?

You'd be hard-pressed to find a more poorly managed company

Better make friends. Managers and above will become petty and retaliatory if they don't like you

Management ready to throw anyone under the bus to avoid their own inability to motivate and be a part of the team.

R&D designs great paper Magic, but is not poised with the talent to design in the digital world.

Poor management.

By the time I left, it appeared that anyone who was brave enough to challenge the CEO and was willing to take a stand for their employees had been replaced by people who must be terrified of losing their jobs. That's the only way I can explain how most of the employees can be treated so poorly by their Senior leaders.

Too many chiefs, not enough Indians.

Some senior management are difficult to work for and some key teams are understaffed and under-resourced.

Questioning a supervisor in any capacity isn't welcomed, regardless of whether you end up being correct and you'll likely be more penalized for not being 'in line' than your supervisor will be for being wrong.

Anyone above you in the hierarchy knows how to maneuver through corporate politics, appeasing those above and encouraging those below, while letting blame slip past when it comes time to fire someone. I saw people maneuvered into positions of blame to excuse their firings more than once, and one truly awful case of firing someone for false cause.

There's not a manager there who knows what they're doing

More managers than actual individual contributors. This sounds cynical. This is true, however.

Poor managers drive away talented individuals, and don't recognize good or hard work. Incompetency is often rewarded with promotion.

Constant poor decisions from upper management will drive you insane.

Middle Management can sometimes be brought in with little understanding about the products they work on and a lack of desire to learn.

There are more managers and bosses than actual workers, which causes for the little people (workers) to be buried in work and are taken for granted.

Epic Rants

Finally, here is what I found to be the most telling review.

If you want a job where you don’t have to work that lets you spend most of the day on Facebook, Reddit or whatever website you want, look no further. Your performance will be measured against a handful of silly goals that you set for yourself. Wizards is ideal for people who just want to stall out career-wise. There is no reward for hard work, so don’t bother trying to get your job satisfaction out of making meaningful contributions. Instead, take advantage of the perks you’ll find at Wizards that you won’t find at any other employer on the planet that actually makes money: take two- to three-hour lunches, two to three times a week… conduct all of your personal business during working hours… “work” from home to care for a sick child… book a conference room on the third floor for a few hours and catch up on Netflix… find a way to use FMLA and take a couple of months off of work entirely… set up a MTGO trading side job to make money from stuff you never paid for!

The good news is that you’ll never be fired because Hasbro’s HR and risk management staff is so afraid of getting sued for wrongful termination that you’d basically have to be caught stealing Magic cards to get fired, and not know the right people who can help you cover up a situation like that.

This was listed under "pros."

I don't know if seeing all of this would make me turn down an opportunity to work at Wizards if such a thing ever came up (and because I write articles like this, it probably won't). I admit, I cherry-picked the bad stuff here, and there were plenty of good comments (although, notably, there were no overwhelmingly good comments. As a rule, employees listed more cons than pros in their reviews). Making Magic cards and being part of a growing company is a huge benefit, and let's be honest: most jobs have aspects you don't like. Did you really expect Wizards to be any different?

Still, if you've dreamed your whole life to work for this company and see reviews like this, it's got to sting a little bit. What do you find most interesting about these employee comments?

Wizards of the Coast is going to try and force  green. I'll explain.

Starting with the English-language release of the upcoming Modern Masters expansion, Wizards is going to try a new, eco-friendly recyclable cardboard package for booster packs. The carton will be recyclable just like any other piece of cardboard and could serve as the test run for all future booster packaging. Chinese and Japanese releases of Modern Masters 2015 will have the standard booster pack wrapper as any other Magic set.

While showing the front of the packaging might give too much away, they shared the back of the carton with us.

In addition to the ecological impact, this appears to have an additional advantage over the traditional wrapper - a perforated tear strip for ease of opening the pack. Traditional booster pack wrappers have a tendency to shred if not opened carefully, making a wad of pieces of mylar in the middle of the table that are tough to pick up. These new cardboard packs will likely make less of a mess although they won't wad up as easily. Most gaming stores don't have a separate container for recyclable material, so it's hard to know if this will have the intended effect, but good on Wizards for making the effort.

You can read the entire announcement here if you're interested.

What do we think of this move? Is this the packaging we want to see or is it a cheap publicity stunt? Leave it below.

Sometimes the game just screws you. You get very unlucky in an important match and feel completely out of control of your destiny. You have some right to complain, so long as you're not complaining to your opponent. Detracting from their win is just bad sportsmanship. We all get it, mulliganing a bunch and losing sucks. We don't need a refresher course in this when we're trying to be happy with our wins.

In particular, it's a big pet peeve of mine when people complain about things that aren't actually that unlikely. A standout in my mind is when people complain about not drawing a one-of in a match of limited. Often times these are the same people who whine when they lose to a bomb and now they're complaining that they didn't win even though they had a bomb in their deck...

This weekend an opponent of mine was talking about how much he had to mulligan on the day, and how it usually doesn't happen with his deck. I mused about how that sort of thing just happens statistically on a long enough timeline. He still seemed convinced that he had hit an unrealistic stroke of bad luck. This reminded me of an interesting example of how statistics work.

Let's say that we're flipping coins. The odds of not getting our desired result on a coin is 50%. The odds of not hitting our desired result three flips in a row is 12.5%. It's relatively unlikely to miss so consistently. However, let's say that we're looking for the odds of hitting the same result three times consecutively within a string of 10 flips. I'm no statistician, but here's how the odds of this occurrence were broken down for me:

Think about it this way: Every string of flips either ends in two matching flips or two non-matching flips.

There are 1024 possible strings so the odds are 178/1024, or 17.38%

If you isolate three flips your odds of such a string are a low 12.5%. If you look for the same result on three flips within a series of ten your odds of hitting such a string are a very likely 82.62%.

Obviously the odds of mulliganing with a given deck probably isn't 50%, but the point stands that unlikely things become very likely if you look at them in long strings as opposed to isolated incidents.

This is just how averages work. If your current experience isn't reflecting general probabilities, it's merely because anecdotes are terrible indicators of trends. Luck is probability taken personally, and the universe is completely indifferent to our complaints.

It's tough to take a bad beat in stride, but it's important to see the value in doing so. Not only does not understanding statistics just generally lead to feeling worse, but acting on these negative feelings can have a negative impact on your ability to network and to glean meaning from your experiences.

I realize the irony in complaining about complaining, but I still hope that this message reaches some people who will benefit from it.